Research on Algorithmic Regulation of Market Manipulation in Algorithmic Trading

随着科技发展,程序化交易在金融市场占比迅速扩张。它具有非结构性、不可解释性、偏置性和非标准化特征,带来了如动量点火、分层报价、反向操作、嗅探试单、报价填充等新型操纵市场行为。目前,其监管存在主观要件认定争议、算法共谋与黑箱导致监管套利、个别风险易系统化、Alpha收益消失且缺乏有效监测标准等问题。针对这些,我国应完善操纵行为监管法规,推进监管重心前移,优化监管职权配置,建立有效检测模型和智能检测标准。With the advancement of technology, programmatic trading has rapidly expanded its share in financial markets. Characterized by non-structural, unexplainable, biased, and non-standardized features, it has introduced novel market manipulation behaviors such as momentum ignition, layered quoting, reverse operations, sniffing and test orders, and quote stuffing. Current regulatory frameworks face challenges, including controversies over the determination of subjective elements, algorithmic collusion and regulatory arbitrage due to black-box algorithms, systemic risks from individual vulnerabilities, the disappearance of Alpha returns, and a lack of effective monitoring standards. To address these issues, China should improve regulatory laws on manipulative behaviors, shift regulatory focus to preemptive measures, optimize the allocation of regulatory authority, and establish robust detection models and intelligent monitoring criteria.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Legal Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2025.136169
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Algorithmic Regulation of Market Manipulation in Algorithmic Trading

自文 井
Open Journal of Legal Science
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Research on Algorithmic Regulation of Market Manipulation in Algorithmic Trading

自文 井
article en

Abstract

随着科技发展,程序化交易在金融市场占比迅速扩张。它具有非结构性、不可解释性、偏置性和非标准化特征,带来了如动量点火、分层报价、反向操作、嗅探试单、报价填充等新型操纵市场行为。目前,其监管存在主观要件认定争议、算法共谋与黑箱导致监管套利、个别风险易系统化、Alpha收益消失且缺乏有效监测标准等问题。针对这些,我国应完善操纵行为监管法规,推进监管重心前移,优化监管职权配置,建立有效检测模型和智能检测标准。With the advancement of technology, programmatic trading has rapidly expanded its share in financial markets. Characterized by non-structural, unexplainable, biased, and non-standardized features, it has introduced novel market manipulation behaviors such as momentum ignition, layered quoting, reverse operations, sniffing and test orders, and quote stuffing. Current regulatory frameworks face challenges, including controversies over the determination of subjective elements, algorithmic collusion and regulatory arbitrage due to black-box algorithms, systemic risks from individual vulnerabilities, the disappearance of Alpha returns, and a lack of effective monitoring standards. To address these issues, China should improve regulatory laws on manipulative behaviors, shift regulatory focus to preemptive measures, optimize the allocation of regulatory authority, and establish robust detection models and intelligent monitoring criteria.

Open Journal of Legal ScienceVol. 13(06)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on Algorithmic Regulation of Market Manipulation in Algorithmic Trading — 自文 井 · Open Journal of Legal Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS