Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine

This educational article explores the utility of bibliometrics and altmetrics in evaluating traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) research. We introduce the concept of bibliometrics and altmetrics, provide an overview of the opportunities and challenges in using these analytical techniques, and highlight their future potential in TCIM research. Bibliometrics, based on publication and citation information, offer insights into TCIM research activity, output, scholarly influence, field structure, and collaboration practices. Altmetrics, including social media mentions, downloads, and online bookmarks, can capture the broader societal engagement with TCIM research beyond traditional academic circles. We discuss challenges and opportunities in utilizing these metrics effectively, such as addressing biases, incorporating cultural nuances, and exploring emerging trends. Additionally, we issue a call to action for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to collaborate and leverage bibliometric and altmetric data to advance evidence-based healthcare practices to promote integrative approaches to health and wellness. By embracing a multidimensional approach to research evaluation, stakeholders can harness the potential of bibliometrics and altmetrics to improve TCIM research and healthcare delivery worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Integrative Medicine Research
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2025.101181
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine

Nicola Robinson, Thomas Ostermann, Dimity Stephen, Jeremy Y. Ng et al.
8 citations
Integrative Medicine Research
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
11.19
article

Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine

Nicola Robinson, Thomas Ostermann, Dimity Stephen, Jeremy Y. Ng, Holger Cramer, Jianping Liu
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This educational article explores the utility of bibliometrics and altmetrics in evaluating traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) research. We introduce the concept of bibliometrics and altmetrics, provide an overview of the opportunities and challenges in using these analytical techniques, and highlight their future potential in TCIM research. Bibliometrics, based on publication and citation information, offer insights into TCIM research activity, output, scholarly influence, field structure, and collaboration practices. Altmetrics, including social media mentions, downloads, and online bookmarks, can capture the broader societal engagement with TCIM research beyond traditional academic circles. We discuss challenges and opportunities in utilizing these metrics effectively, such as addressing biases, incorporating cultural nuances, and exploring emerging trends. Additionally, we issue a call to action for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to collaborate and leverage bibliometric and altmetric data to advance evidence-based healthcare practices to promote integrative approaches to health and wellness. By embracing a multidimensional approach to research evaluation, stakeholders can harness the potential of bibliometrics and altmetrics to improve TCIM research and healthcare delivery worldwide.

Integrative Medicine ResearchVol. 14(3)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Witten/Herdecke University (DE), Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), London South Bank University (GB), German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DE), Bosch Health Campus, Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
11.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.