Reevaluating South Dakota's Medical Malpractice Damages Cap

South Dakota Codified Law section 21-3-11 limits damages recoverable in medical malpractice actions. The cap limits non-economic damages to $500,000, regardless of the jury’s award. The South Dakota Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the cap in Knowles ex rel. Knowles v. United States (In re Certification of Questions of Law). This article argues this cap not only constrains the jury’s role in the judicial process but also impacts plaintiffs who suffer severe injuries and require compensation beyond economic losses. This article argues the cap does not align with fundamental principles of fairness and negatively affects both physicians and plaintiffs. By exploring alternative solutions, this article proposes options that aim to even the judicial playing field for malpractice victims—while still discouraging meritless claims—respecting the interests of all parties involved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South Dakota law review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70657/sdlr.v70.i3.563
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reevaluating South Dakota's Medical Malpractice Damages Cap

Zane Rankin
1 citations
South Dakota law review
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
2.02
article

Reevaluating South Dakota's Medical Malpractice Damages Cap

Zane Rankin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

South Dakota Codified Law section 21-3-11 limits damages recoverable in medical malpractice actions. The cap limits non-economic damages to $500,000, regardless of the jury’s award. The South Dakota Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the cap in Knowles ex rel. Knowles v. United States (In re Certification of Questions of Law). This article argues this cap not only constrains the jury’s role in the judicial process but also impacts plaintiffs who suffer severe injuries and require compensation beyond economic losses. This article argues the cap does not align with fundamental principles of fairness and negatively affects both physicians and plaintiffs. By exploring alternative solutions, this article proposes options that aim to even the judicial playing field for malpractice victims—while still discouraging meritless claims—respecting the interests of all parties involved.

South Dakota law reviewVol. 70(3)
University of South Dakota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.