Have Recent Legislative Changes in South Dakota Made Using the Initiated Measure Process More Difficult?

The right of the people to initiate and refer laws has been enshrined in South Dakota’s Constitution since 1898. In recent years, citizen advocates have used the initiated measure process to raise the minimum wage (2014), end payday lending (2016), and expand Medicaid (2022). In November 2020, Amendment A passed with 54% of the vote, legalizing recreational marijuana. However, after judicial review, this result was nullified. While these ballot measures were being organized and promoted, South Dakota’s Republican supermajority legislature and two Republican Governors enacted dozens of changes to the initiative and referendum process. Some of these measures, too, have been successfully challenged in court and enjoined. In this article, the authors make five main contributions: 1) they lay out a brief political history of the initiative and referendum process in South Dakota; 2) they discuss a series of the worst bills passed between 2017-2024 that infringe on how citizens initiate and/or refer measures; 3) they summarize twelve measures considered during the recently completed 2025 legislative session; 4) they also analyze three significant judicial opinions related to initiated measures from the South Dakota Supreme Court, U.S. District Court, and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals; and finally 5) the authors recommend changes to the initiative and referendum process. Their goal is to enhance transparency, better inform citizens, and to make it easier for South Dakota citizens to benefit from this 127-year-old constitutionally granted right.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
South Dakota law review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70657/sdlr.v70.i3.520
Primary Topic
Canadian Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Have Recent Legislative Changes in South Dakota Made Using the Initiated Measure Process More Difficult?

Teagan McNary, Cory Heidelberger, Reynold Nesiba
South Dakota law review
Canadian Policy and Governance
article

Have Recent Legislative Changes in South Dakota Made Using the Initiated Measure Process More Difficult?

Teagan McNary, Cory Heidelberger, Reynold Nesiba
article en

Abstract

The right of the people to initiate and refer laws has been enshrined in South Dakota’s Constitution since 1898. In recent years, citizen advocates have used the initiated measure process to raise the minimum wage (2014), end payday lending (2016), and expand Medicaid (2022). In November 2020, Amendment A passed with 54% of the vote, legalizing recreational marijuana. However, after judicial review, this result was nullified. While these ballot measures were being organized and promoted, South Dakota’s Republican supermajority legislature and two Republican Governors enacted dozens of changes to the initiative and referendum process. Some of these measures, too, have been successfully challenged in court and enjoined. In this article, the authors make five main contributions: 1) they lay out a brief political history of the initiative and referendum process in South Dakota; 2) they discuss a series of the worst bills passed between 2017-2024 that infringe on how citizens initiate and/or refer measures; 3) they summarize twelve measures considered during the recently completed 2025 legislative session; 4) they also analyze three significant judicial opinions related to initiated measures from the South Dakota Supreme Court, U.S. District Court, and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals; and finally 5) the authors recommend changes to the initiative and referendum process. Their goal is to enhance transparency, better inform citizens, and to make it easier for South Dakota citizens to benefit from this 127-year-old constitutionally granted right.

South Dakota law reviewVol. 70(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Canadian Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.