Opinion: Revisiting synthetic data classifications from a privacy perspective

Synthetic data is emerging as a cost-effective solution necessary to meet the increasing data demands of AI development, created either from existing knowledge or derived from real data. The traditional classification of synthetic data types into hybrid, partial or fully synthetic datasets has limited value and does not reflect the ever-increasing methods to generate synthetic data. The generation method and their source jointly shape the characteristics of synthetic data, which in turn determines its practical applications. We make a case for an alternative approach to grouping synthetic data types that better reflect privacy perspectives in order to facilitate regulatory guidance in the generation and processing of synthetic data. This approach to classification provides flexibility to new advancements like deep generative methods and offers a more practical framework for future applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Machine Intelligence
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/nmi.12377
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Opinion: Revisiting synthetic data classifications from a privacy perspective

Jan F. Nygård, Vibeke Binz Vallevik, Serena Marshall, Aleksandar Babić
1 citations
Nordic Machine Intelligence
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
article

Opinion: Revisiting synthetic data classifications from a privacy perspective

Jan F. Nygård, Vibeke Binz Vallevik, Serena Marshall, Aleksandar Babić
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Synthetic data is emerging as a cost-effective solution necessary to meet the increasing data demands of AI development, created either from existing knowledge or derived from real data. The traditional classification of synthetic data types into hybrid, partial or fully synthetic datasets has limited value and does not reflect the ever-increasing methods to generate synthetic data. The generation method and their source jointly shape the characteristics of synthetic data, which in turn determines its practical applications. We make a case for an alternative approach to grouping synthetic data types that better reflect privacy perspectives in order to facilitate regulatory guidance in the generation and processing of synthetic data. This approach to classification provides flexibility to new advancements like deep generative methods and offers a more practical framework for future applications.

Nordic Machine IntelligenceVol. 5(1)
DNV (Norway) (NO), Universidad José Cecilio del Valle (HN), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Opinion: Revisiting synthetic data classifications from a privacy perspective — Jan F. Nygård, Vibeke Binz Vallevik, et al. · Nordic Machine Intelligence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS