Anomalous Differences Between the Global Lung Function Initiative 2023 and 2012 Spirometry Reference Values

It was concluded that the inverse weighting strategy used to develop the GLI 2023 spirometric reference values introduced a systematic bias that skewed the predicted values, producing progressively overestimated predicted lung volumes with increasing age in adults and progressively underestimated predicted lung volumes with increasing age in children and adolescents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CHEST Journal
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.06.005
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anomalous Differences Between the Global Lung Function Initiative 2023 and 2012 Spirometry Reference Values

Allan L. Coates, Yet Hong Khor, Brian L. Graham, Veronica Marcoux
3 citations
CHEST Journal
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
4.56
article

Anomalous Differences Between the Global Lung Function Initiative 2023 and 2012 Spirometry Reference Values

Allan L. Coates, Yet Hong Khor, Brian L. Graham, Veronica Marcoux
article en
3 citations

Abstract

It was concluded that the inverse weighting strategy used to develop the GLI 2023 spirometric reference values introduced a systematic bias that skewed the predicted values, producing progressively overestimated predicted lung volumes with increasing age in adults and progressively underestimated predicted lung volumes with increasing age in children and adolescents.

CHEST JournalVol. 168(5)
University of Toronto (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), SickKids Foundation (CA), Monash University (AU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.