Evaluating the influence of trunk intra-muscular and intra-abdominal pressure on spinal geometric compensation

Biomechanical modelling studies have revealed the impact of passive mechanical properties of spinal soft tissues on spinal configuration. This study extends prior work by evaluating the involvement of trunk abdominal and intramuscular pressure (IMP), on spinal geometric compensation, using a validated finite element spine model. The model included the vertebrae, rib cage, IVD, pelvis, ligaments, abdominal cavity and abdominal and spinal muscles. Over a fixed pelvis, the model underwent a 60° forward flexion. Muscles and the abdominal cavity were modelled as fluid-filled solid entities containing hydrostatic pressure elements, enabling IMP and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) quantification. Changes in lumbar segmental rotations, spine range of motion (RoM) and curvature (thoracic kyphotic (TKA) and lumbar lordotic angle (LLA)) were analyzed following a 1) 10-fold increase and decrease in paraspinal IMP and a 2) 20-fold increase in IAP, relative to the validated model. A 10-fold increase in paraspinal IMP or 20-fold increase in IAP decreased lumbar ROM by a maximum of 8.4° and increased the TKA and LLA by a maximum of 5.8° and 4.7°, respectively during forward flexion. Heightened IAP correlated with decreased paraspinal IMP. Conversely increased paraspinal IMP correlated with IAP reductions. This investigation showed a synergistic interplay between paraspinal IMP and IAP on segmental mobility and spine geometry. The shared influence may suggest a clinical impact of targeting both muscle groups in scenarios involving lower back dysfunction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanics
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112822
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the influence of trunk intra-muscular and intra-abdominal pressure on spinal geometric compensation

Mark Driscoll, Ahmed Aoude, Adi Mithani
Journal of Biomechanics
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Evaluating the influence of trunk intra-muscular and intra-abdominal pressure on spinal geometric compensation

Mark Driscoll, Ahmed Aoude, Adi Mithani
article en

Abstract

Biomechanical modelling studies have revealed the impact of passive mechanical properties of spinal soft tissues on spinal configuration. This study extends prior work by evaluating the involvement of trunk abdominal and intramuscular pressure (IMP), on spinal geometric compensation, using a validated finite element spine model. The model included the vertebrae, rib cage, IVD, pelvis, ligaments, abdominal cavity and abdominal and spinal muscles. Over a fixed pelvis, the model underwent a 60° forward flexion. Muscles and the abdominal cavity were modelled as fluid-filled solid entities containing hydrostatic pressure elements, enabling IMP and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) quantification. Changes in lumbar segmental rotations, spine range of motion (RoM) and curvature (thoracic kyphotic (TKA) and lumbar lordotic angle (LLA)) were analyzed following a 1) 10-fold increase and decrease in paraspinal IMP and a 2) 20-fold increase in IAP, relative to the validated model. A 10-fold increase in paraspinal IMP or 20-fold increase in IAP decreased lumbar ROM by a maximum of 8.4° and increased the TKA and LLA by a maximum of 5.8° and 4.7°, respectively during forward flexion. Heightened IAP correlated with decreased paraspinal IMP. Conversely increased paraspinal IMP correlated with IAP reductions. This investigation showed a synergistic interplay between paraspinal IMP and IAP on segmental mobility and spine geometry. The shared influence may suggest a clinical impact of targeting both muscle groups in scenarios involving lower back dysfunction.

Journal of BiomechanicsVol. 189
Montreal General Hospital (CA), McGill University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.