Bully-victim network perceptions of bullies, victims, and peer observers

Bullying is a complex social construct, and informants (e.g., bullies, victims, and peer observers) may have differing perceptions about bully-victim relationships. This study examines how informant perspectives differ using network data obtained from 438 fifth-grade students ( M age = 11.19 years old, 46 % girls) in 13 Indonesian elementary school classrooms. Using a cross-informant framework, we investigated how self- and peer-reported bully-victim relationships overlapped as a function of the sex of bullies and victims, friendship ties, and relational schemas (i.e., mental network heuristics). Results from a multiplex exponential random graph model revealed significant agreement between self- and peer-reports. There was greater agreement when bully-victim relationships occurred between non-friends. When self- and peer-reports disagreed, peers identified more instances of boys engaging in bullying than girls, as well as more cross-sex than same-sex bully-victim relationships. Self-reports more often identified bully-victim relationships between friends than between non-friends. Post-hoc analyses revealed that bullies and their friends often had conflicting views of their friendship. Additionally, peers reported more victims per bully and fewer bullies per victim when compared to self-reports. These findings contribute to the understanding of the network structure of bully-victim perceptions and offer practical implications for identifying bully-victim relationships. • Consensus on bully-victim relationships: Preadolescent bullies, victims, and peers often agreed on those ties. • Asymmetric awareness: When views differed, peers saw more victims per bully and fewer bullies per victim than self-reports. • Reciprocal bully-victim relationships: These ties were more often mutual than expected by random networks. • Moderation by gender: Peers reported more bullying by boys and more cross-sex bully-victim ties than self-reports. • Relational misperceptions within friendships: Bullies often saw victims as friends; this bullying was less visible to peers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Networks
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2025.06.002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bully-victim network perceptions of bullies, victims, and peer observers

Jeremy Foote, Seung-yoon Sophia Lee, Kyosuke Tanaka, Doran C. French et al.
2 citations
Social Networks
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
4.88
article

Bully-victim network perceptions of bullies, victims, and peer observers

Jeremy Foote, Seung-yoon Sophia Lee, Kyosuke Tanaka, Doran C. French, Keqin Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Bullying is a complex social construct, and informants (e.g., bullies, victims, and peer observers) may have differing perceptions about bully-victim relationships. This study examines how informant perspectives differ using network data obtained from 438 fifth-grade students ( M age = 11.19 years old, 46 % girls) in 13 Indonesian elementary school classrooms. Using a cross-informant framework, we investigated how self- and peer-reported bully-victim relationships overlapped as a function of the sex of bullies and victims, friendship ties, and relational schemas (i.e., mental network heuristics). Results from a multiplex exponential random graph model revealed significant agreement between self- and peer-reports. There was greater agreement when bully-victim relationships occurred between non-friends. When self- and peer-reports disagreed, peers identified more instances of boys engaging in bullying than girls, as well as more cross-sex than same-sex bully-victim relationships. Self-reports more often identified bully-victim relationships between friends than between non-friends. Post-hoc analyses revealed that bullies and their friends often had conflicting views of their friendship. Additionally, peers reported more victims per bully and fewer bullies per victim when compared to self-reports. These findings contribute to the understanding of the network structure of bully-victim perceptions and offer practical implications for identifying bully-victim relationships. • Consensus on bully-victim relationships: Preadolescent bullies, victims, and peers often agreed on those ties. • Asymmetric awareness: When views differed, peers saw more victims per bully and fewer bullies per victim than self-reports. • Reciprocal bully-victim relationships: These ties were more often mutual than expected by random networks. • Moderation by gender: Peers reported more bullying by boys and more cross-sex bully-victim ties than self-reports. • Relational misperceptions within friendships: Bullies often saw victims as friends; this bullying was less visible to peers.

Social NetworksVol. 83
Aarhus University (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.