Exploring public risk perception of multiple hazards through network analysis

Humans face various hazards, making it challenging to apply a precautionary approach to all of them. Instead, individuals prioritize risk reduction based on perceived threats and lived experiences, often considering multiple hazards simultaneously. This study explores how public perceptions of multiple hazards are interconnected and change over time in Italy and Sweden, using data from three representative surveys (<i>n</i> = 12,476) conducted in August 2020, November 2020, and August 2021. We assess risk perception across three dimensions (likelihood, impact, and authority knowledge) for nine hazards, including epidemics, climate change, and natural disasters. Findings reveal that recently encountered hazards, such as COVID-19, become more closely connected to other hazards. At the same time, connections among hazards such as wildfires, droughts, and floods remain stable over time. These results indicate a dual component of public risk perception of multiple hazards, offering valuable insights for shaping public health policies and climate adaptation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Sustainability
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100424
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring public risk perception of multiple hazards through network analysis

Maurizio Mazzoleni, Elena Raffetti, Marcus R. Munafò, Owen Taylor et al.
2 citations
Cell Reports Sustainability
Mental Health Research Topics
4.24
article

Exploring public risk perception of multiple hazards through network analysis

Maurizio Mazzoleni, Elena Raffetti, Marcus R. Munafò, Owen Taylor, Federico Triolo, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Jasmine Khouja, Sarah Dryhurst, Blanca Paniello-Castillo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Humans face various hazards, making it challenging to apply a precautionary approach to all of them. Instead, individuals prioritize risk reduction based on perceived threats and lived experiences, often considering multiple hazards simultaneously. This study explores how public perceptions of multiple hazards are interconnected and change over time in Italy and Sweden, using data from three representative surveys (<i>n</i> = 12,476) conducted in August 2020, November 2020, and August 2021. We assess risk perception across three dimensions (likelihood, impact, and authority knowledge) for nine hazards, including epidemics, climate change, and natural disasters. Findings reveal that recently encountered hazards, such as COVID-19, become more closely connected to other hazards. At the same time, connections among hazards such as wildfires, droughts, and floods remain stable over time. These results indicate a dual component of public risk perception of multiple hazards, offering valuable insights for shaping public health policies and climate adaptation strategies.

Cell Reports SustainabilityVol. 2(7)
Uppsala University (SE), Stockholm University (SE), University of Cambridge (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), British Heart Foundation (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Systemic Risk Centre (GB), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB), Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (SE), University College London (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Wellcome, National Institute on Handicapped Research, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate, Scottish Government, National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health and Social Care, University of Bristol, Public Health Agency, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate, Centrum för naturkatastrofslära, Uppsala Universitet, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, European Research Council, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health Research Topics
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.