Results of Chromosomal Microarray Need to Always Be Checked by (Molecular) Cytogenetics—Even If They Seem to Be Simple Deletions

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Chromosome microarrays (CMAs) tend to be used as the first line test or as a test that does not require confirmation or verification by a second test. However, to understand the implications of a duplication or deletion for a family seeking genetic counseling, it is crucial to know the nature of the underlying chromosomal rearrangement. Here, we present seven cases with apparent isolated copy number loss, five of which showed unexpected complexity. <b>Methods:</b> Seven cases were investigated by CMA due to intellectual disability and/or dysmorphic features. Isolated deletions ranging in size from ~0.6 to ~21 Mb were found and referred for further characterization of the underlying chromosomal rearrangement. To elucidate the cases, fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed using locus-specific, whole and partial chromosome painting and/or multicolor banding. <b>Results:</b> Among the seven selected cases, there were five with unexpected complexity. Isolated deletions were actually evidence of chromoanasynthesis, ring chromosome formation, unbalanced translocation, or unbalanced insertion. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results clearly underscore that it seems reasonable to examine every case with a copy number variant-even if it appears to be "only" a simple partial deletion-using banding and/or molecular cytogenetic testing in order to make a qualified assessment of the situation and, on this basis, ensure sound genetic counseling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genes
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16060714
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results of Chromosomal Microarray Need to Always Be Checked by (Molecular) Cytogenetics—Even If They Seem to Be Simple Deletions

Uwe Kornak, Thomas Liehr, Niklas Padutsch, Sylke Singer et al.
2 citations
Genes
Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
3.63
article

Results of Chromosomal Microarray Need to Always Be Checked by (Molecular) Cytogenetics—Even If They Seem to Be Simple Deletions

Uwe Kornak, Thomas Liehr, Niklas Padutsch, Sylke Singer, Luisa Person, Ulrike A. Mau‐Holzmann, Stefanie Kankel, Eva Daumiller
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Chromosome microarrays (CMAs) tend to be used as the first line test or as a test that does not require confirmation or verification by a second test. However, to understand the implications of a duplication or deletion for a family seeking genetic counseling, it is crucial to know the nature of the underlying chromosomal rearrangement. Here, we present seven cases with apparent isolated copy number loss, five of which showed unexpected complexity. <b>Methods:</b> Seven cases were investigated by CMA due to intellectual disability and/or dysmorphic features. Isolated deletions ranging in size from ~0.6 to ~21 Mb were found and referred for further characterization of the underlying chromosomal rearrangement. To elucidate the cases, fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed using locus-specific, whole and partial chromosome painting and/or multicolor banding. <b>Results:</b> Among the seven selected cases, there were five with unexpected complexity. Isolated deletions were actually evidence of chromoanasynthesis, ring chromosome formation, unbalanced translocation, or unbalanced insertion. <b>Conclusions:</b> These results clearly underscore that it seems reasonable to examine every case with a copy number variant-even if it appears to be "only" a simple partial deletion-using banding and/or molecular cytogenetic testing in order to make a qualified assessment of the situation and, on this basis, ensure sound genetic counseling.

GenesVol. 16(6)
Genetikum (DE), Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE), Jena University Hospital (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.