Investigating the Reliability and Dynamic Response of Fully 3D-Printed Thermistors

This paper investigates the measurement capability, dynamic response, and mechanical reliability of all 3D-printed multi-material thermistors. The thermistor design consisted of three main components: a polycarbonate (PC) substrate, a silver (Ag) electrode pair, and a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) thermosensitive layer. The thermistors were fabricated using two manufacturing techniques: fused deposition modeling (FDM) for the substrate and micro-dispensing for the Ag and PEDOT:PSS films. Two designs with different sensing areas, D1 (90 mm2) and D2 (54 mm2), were fabricated. As the indicator of measurement capability, the highest thermal indexes were recorded as 905.64 and 813.03 K for D1 and D2 thermistors, respectively. Thermistors exhibited comparable dynamic performance, with normalized resistance variations ranging from 0.96 to 1 for temperature changes between 25 and 45 °C. The sensing area influenced both measurement capability and dynamic performance, where larger sensing areas enhanced measurement capability but extended the time required to complete dynamic cycles, around 400 s for D1 versus 350 s for D2. Adhesion tests revealed a strong bonding between the PEDOT:PSS and Ag layer with less than 5% material removal. However, the adhesion of the PEDOT:PSS to the PC substrate was weak, with over 65% material removal. Morphological analysis indicated that the poor adhesion was caused by suboptimal surface properties of the 3D-printed substrate, even resulting in gaps between these two surfaces. This study demonstrates that our all 3D-printed multi-material thermistors can match reported measurement performance with an acceptable dynamic performance while highlighting the need to improve 3D-printed substrate surface properties to enhance the performance of such multi-material structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126822
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electrical and Thermal Properties of Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the Reliability and Dynamic Response of Fully 3D-Printed Thermistors

A. Johnson, Umur I. Cicek, Darren Southee
3 citations
Applied Sciences
Electrical and Thermal Properties of Materials
2.19
article

Investigating the Reliability and Dynamic Response of Fully 3D-Printed Thermistors

A. Johnson, Umur I. Cicek, Darren Southee
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the measurement capability, dynamic response, and mechanical reliability of all 3D-printed multi-material thermistors. The thermistor design consisted of three main components: a polycarbonate (PC) substrate, a silver (Ag) electrode pair, and a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) thermosensitive layer. The thermistors were fabricated using two manufacturing techniques: fused deposition modeling (FDM) for the substrate and micro-dispensing for the Ag and PEDOT:PSS films. Two designs with different sensing areas, D1 (90 mm2) and D2 (54 mm2), were fabricated. As the indicator of measurement capability, the highest thermal indexes were recorded as 905.64 and 813.03 K for D1 and D2 thermistors, respectively. Thermistors exhibited comparable dynamic performance, with normalized resistance variations ranging from 0.96 to 1 for temperature changes between 25 and 45 °C. The sensing area influenced both measurement capability and dynamic performance, where larger sensing areas enhanced measurement capability but extended the time required to complete dynamic cycles, around 400 s for D1 versus 350 s for D2. Adhesion tests revealed a strong bonding between the PEDOT:PSS and Ag layer with less than 5% material removal. However, the adhesion of the PEDOT:PSS to the PC substrate was weak, with over 65% material removal. Morphological analysis indicated that the poor adhesion was caused by suboptimal surface properties of the 3D-printed substrate, even resulting in gaps between these two surfaces. This study demonstrates that our all 3D-printed multi-material thermistors can match reported measurement performance with an acceptable dynamic performance while highlighting the need to improve 3D-printed substrate surface properties to enhance the performance of such multi-material structures.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(12)
Loughborough University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Electrical and Thermal Properties of Materials
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating the Reliability and Dynamic Response of Fully 3D-Printed Thermistors — A. Johnson, Umur I. Cicek, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS