Minimum Audible Angle in 3rd-Order Ambisonics in Horizontal Plane for Different Ambisonic Decoders

As immersive audio is gaining popularity, the perceptual aspects of spatial sound reproduction become relevant. The authors investigate a measure related to spatial resolution, the Minimum Audible Angle (MAA), which is understudied in the context of Ambisonics. This study examines MAA thresholds in the horizontal plane in three ambisonic decoders—the Sample Ambisonic Decoder (SAD), Energy-Preserving Ambisonic Decoder (EPAD), and All-Round Ambisonic Decoder (AllRAD). The results demonstrate that the decoder type influences spatial resolution, with the EPAD exhibiting superior performance in MAA thresholds (1.24∘ at 0∘ azimuth) compared to the SAD and AllRAD. These differences reflect the discrepancies in the decoders’ energy vector distribution and angular error. The MAA values remain consistent between decoders up to 30∘ azimuth but diverge significantly beyond this range, especially in the 60∘–135∘ region corresponding to the cone of confusion. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for spatial audio applications based on ambisonic technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126815
Primary Topic
Digital Filter Design and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimum Audible Angle in 3rd-Order Ambisonics in Horizontal Plane for Different Ambisonic Decoders

Katarzyna Sochaczewska, Jerzy Wiciak, Karolina Prawda, Paweł Małecki et al.
Applied Sciences
Digital Filter Design and Implementation
article

Minimum Audible Angle in 3rd-Order Ambisonics in Horizontal Plane for Different Ambisonic Decoders

Katarzyna Sochaczewska, Jerzy Wiciak, Karolina Prawda, Paweł Małecki, Magdalena Piotrowska
article en

Abstract

As immersive audio is gaining popularity, the perceptual aspects of spatial sound reproduction become relevant. The authors investigate a measure related to spatial resolution, the Minimum Audible Angle (MAA), which is understudied in the context of Ambisonics. This study examines MAA thresholds in the horizontal plane in three ambisonic decoders—the Sample Ambisonic Decoder (SAD), Energy-Preserving Ambisonic Decoder (EPAD), and All-Round Ambisonic Decoder (AllRAD). The results demonstrate that the decoder type influences spatial resolution, with the EPAD exhibiting superior performance in MAA thresholds (1.24∘ at 0∘ azimuth) compared to the SAD and AllRAD. These differences reflect the discrepancies in the decoders’ energy vector distribution and angular error. The MAA values remain consistent between decoders up to 30∘ azimuth but diverge significantly beyond this range, especially in the 60∘–135∘ region corresponding to the cone of confusion. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for spatial audio applications based on ambisonic technology.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(12)
Jagiellonian University (PL), University of York (GB), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Digital Filter Design and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Minimum Audible Angle in 3rd-Order Ambisonics in Horizontal Plane for Different Ambisonic Decoders — Katarzyna Sochaczewska, Jerzy Wiciak, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS