Measuring Multisensory Integration in Clinical Settings: Comparing an Established Laboratory Method with a Novel Digital Health App

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Recent research has correlated an inability to integrate sensory information with several adverse clinical outcomes, including slow gait, poor balance, and falls. For this reason, a digital health iPhone app (CatchU<sup>®</sup> v3.1.2) has been strategically designed to bring the measurement of visual-somatosensory integration into clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether CatchU could reliably capture the phenomenon of multisensory integration compared to a validated piece of laboratory apparatus ("tristimulator"). <b>Methods</b>: Using both the established tristimulator and CatchU, 50 participants (76.5 ± 6.2 years of age, 60% female) completed a simple reaction time test in response to visual, somatosensory, and combined visual-somatosensory stimulation. A reaction time cumulative distribution frequency (CDF) curve was calculated for each stimulus condition, and together these were used to calculate the CDF difference function (the multisensory visual-somatosensory CDF minus a magnitude-limited sum of the unisensory visual and somatosensory CDFs). From this, the magnitude of visual-somatosensory integration (VSI) was obtained. <b>Results</b>: CatchU captured multisensory integration in both average reaction times and the CDF difference function. It also produced a similar magnitude of VSI and showed no systematic bias compared to the laboratory stimulator. Additionally, CatchU responses were significantly less variable than responses recorded using the tristimulator. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite using different forms of stimulation and different methods to record responses, these results reveal that CatchU can be used to produce the same inferences as laboratory apparatus. This confirms the ability of CatchU to reliably capture VSI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060653
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Multisensory Integration in Clinical Settings: Comparing an Established Laboratory Method with a Novel Digital Health App

Jeannette R. Mahoney, James Gordon, Mooyeon Oh‐Park, Tanya Verghese et al.
1 citations
Brain Sciences
Multisensory perception and integration
2.12
article

Measuring Multisensory Integration in Clinical Settings: Comparing an Established Laboratory Method with a Novel Digital Health App

Jeannette R. Mahoney, James Gordon, Mooyeon Oh‐Park, Tanya Verghese, Valerie Nunez, Vance Zemon, Jessica Silvers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Recent research has correlated an inability to integrate sensory information with several adverse clinical outcomes, including slow gait, poor balance, and falls. For this reason, a digital health iPhone app (CatchU<sup>®</sup> v3.1.2) has been strategically designed to bring the measurement of visual-somatosensory integration into clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether CatchU could reliably capture the phenomenon of multisensory integration compared to a validated piece of laboratory apparatus ("tristimulator"). <b>Methods</b>: Using both the established tristimulator and CatchU, 50 participants (76.5 ± 6.2 years of age, 60% female) completed a simple reaction time test in response to visual, somatosensory, and combined visual-somatosensory stimulation. A reaction time cumulative distribution frequency (CDF) curve was calculated for each stimulus condition, and together these were used to calculate the CDF difference function (the multisensory visual-somatosensory CDF minus a magnitude-limited sum of the unisensory visual and somatosensory CDFs). From this, the magnitude of visual-somatosensory integration (VSI) was obtained. <b>Results</b>: CatchU captured multisensory integration in both average reaction times and the CDF difference function. It also produced a similar magnitude of VSI and showed no systematic bias compared to the laboratory stimulator. Additionally, CatchU responses were significantly less variable than responses recorded using the tristimulator. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite using different forms of stimulation and different methods to record responses, these results reveal that CatchU can be used to produce the same inferences as laboratory apparatus. This confirms the ability of CatchU to reliably capture VSI.

Brain SciencesVol. 15(6)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), City University of New York (US), Yeshiva University (US), Burke Rehabilitation Hospital (US), Hunter College (US), Stony Brook School (US), University of Rochester (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Multisensory perception and integration
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.