Impact of Developer Queries on the Effectiveness of Conversational Large Language Models in Programming

This study investigates the effects of LLM-based coding assistance on web application development by students using a frontend framework. Rather than comparing different models, it focuses on how students interact with LLM tools to isolate the impact of query type on coding success. To this end, participants were instructed to rely exclusively on LLMs for writing code, based on a given set of specifications, and their queries were categorized into seven types: Error Fixing (EF), Feature Implementation (FI), Code Optimization (CO), Code Understanding (CU), Best Practices (BP), Documentation (DOC), and Concept Clarification (CC). The results reveal that students who queried LLMs for error fixing (EF) were statistically more likely to have runnable code, regardless of prior knowledge. Additionally, students seeking code understanding (CU) and error fixing performed better, even when normalizing for previous coding ability. These findings suggest that the nature of the queries made to LLMs influences the success of programming tasks and provides insights into how AI tools can assist learning in software development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126836
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Developer Queries on the Effectiveness of Conversational Large Language Models in Programming

Patrik Rek, Sašo Karakatič, Viktor Taneski, Gregor Jošt
Applied Sciences
Topic Modeling
article

Impact of Developer Queries on the Effectiveness of Conversational Large Language Models in Programming

Patrik Rek, Sašo Karakatič, Viktor Taneski, Gregor Jošt
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of LLM-based coding assistance on web application development by students using a frontend framework. Rather than comparing different models, it focuses on how students interact with LLM tools to isolate the impact of query type on coding success. To this end, participants were instructed to rely exclusively on LLMs for writing code, based on a given set of specifications, and their queries were categorized into seven types: Error Fixing (EF), Feature Implementation (FI), Code Optimization (CO), Code Understanding (CU), Best Practices (BP), Documentation (DOC), and Concept Clarification (CC). The results reveal that students who queried LLMs for error fixing (EF) were statistically more likely to have runnable code, regardless of prior knowledge. Additionally, students seeking code understanding (CU) and error fixing performed better, even when normalizing for previous coding ability. These findings suggest that the nature of the queries made to LLMs influences the success of programming tasks and provides insights into how AI tools can assist learning in software development.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(12)
University of Maribor (SI)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.