Economic Policy Analysis of the "Taiwan Miracle" and Why Indonesia Needs to Learn It?

This study aims to analyze the role of economic policy and institutional capacity in driving Taiwan's economic growth in the period 1953–1982, and to compare the development experience with Indonesia during the same period. This study uses a qualitative comparative study method based on primary and secondary literature, including Thomas B. Gold's work "State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle" and various sources on Indonesian economic policy during the New Order era. The data used include statistics on economic growth, industrial structure, investment, and social indicators from both countries. The results show that Taiwan has succeeded in achieving high and sustainable economic growth through agrarian reform, export orientation, large investments in education and infrastructure, and the development of dynamic SMEs. Meanwhile, Indonesia's economic growth is more driven by natural resource exports and is less supported by deep structural transformation, making it vulnerable to fluctuations in global commodity prices and social inequality. These findings emphasize the importance of a proactive state role, strengthening institutional capacity, and synergy between the state and the market in creating inclusive and sustainable economic development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-political Communication and Policy Review
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61292/shkr.258
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Policy Analysis of the "Taiwan Miracle" and Why Indonesia Needs to Learn It?

Dico M Ganinduto
Socio-political Communication and Policy Review
Asian Studies and History
article

Economic Policy Analysis of the "Taiwan Miracle" and Why Indonesia Needs to Learn It?

Dico M Ganinduto
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of economic policy and institutional capacity in driving Taiwan's economic growth in the period 1953–1982, and to compare the development experience with Indonesia during the same period. This study uses a qualitative comparative study method based on primary and secondary literature, including Thomas B. Gold's work "State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle" and various sources on Indonesian economic policy during the New Order era. The data used include statistics on economic growth, industrial structure, investment, and social indicators from both countries. The results show that Taiwan has succeeded in achieving high and sustainable economic growth through agrarian reform, export orientation, large investments in education and infrastructure, and the development of dynamic SMEs. Meanwhile, Indonesia's economic growth is more driven by natural resource exports and is less supported by deep structural transformation, making it vulnerable to fluctuations in global commodity prices and social inequality. These findings emphasize the importance of a proactive state role, strengthening institutional capacity, and synergy between the state and the market in creating inclusive and sustainable economic development.

Socio-political Communication and Policy Review
Diponegoro University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.