Consumer Evaluations and Warner-Bratzler Shear Force of Foodservice Tenderloin Steaks Sourced From Different Market Classes of Domestic and Imported Beef

The objectives of this study were to evaluate consumer sensory ratings and objective tenderness of 6 different sources of tenderloin steaks for the foodservice industry. Tenderloins were from 6 sources: (1) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Choice, (2) USDA Select, (3) white-fat cow, (4) yellow-fat cow, (5) Uruguay, and (6) Australia. Fresh tenderloins (n = 162; 27 tenderloins × 6 sources) were collected and fabricated into 6 steaks. Steaks were designated for consumer sensory analysis or Warner-Bratzler shear (WBS) force. Consumers evaluated sensory steaks for juiciness like/dislike, flavor like/dislike, tenderness like/dislike, overall like/dislike, and provided qualitative descriptors. Consumers rated white-fat cow steaks, Australian steaks, and USDA Choice steaks among the greatest (P < 0.05) for overall liking. White-fat cow steaks and yellow-fat cow steaks had lower (P < 0.05) WBS force values than Uruguayan steaks. These findings suggest that tenderloins from sources other than USDA Choice may provide cost-effective options for foodservice markets. Depending on market prices, white-fat cow and Australian carcasses could both serve as economically suitable sources of tenderloins for foodservice establishments while still providing a similar eating experience to USDA Choice carcass steaks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meat and Muscle Biology
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.19816
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Evaluations and Warner-Bratzler Shear Force of Foodservice Tenderloin Steaks Sourced From Different Market Classes of Domestic and Imported Beef

J.W. Savell, S. B. Tindel, S. L. Boleman, Kerri B. Gehring
1 links
Meat and Muscle Biology
Library Science and Information Systems
article

Consumer Evaluations and Warner-Bratzler Shear Force of Foodservice Tenderloin Steaks Sourced From Different Market Classes of Domestic and Imported Beef

J.W. Savell, S. B. Tindel, S. L. Boleman, Kerri B. Gehring
article en

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate consumer sensory ratings and objective tenderness of 6 different sources of tenderloin steaks for the foodservice industry. Tenderloins were from 6 sources: (1) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Choice, (2) USDA Select, (3) white-fat cow, (4) yellow-fat cow, (5) Uruguay, and (6) Australia. Fresh tenderloins (n = 162; 27 tenderloins × 6 sources) were collected and fabricated into 6 steaks. Steaks were designated for consumer sensory analysis or Warner-Bratzler shear (WBS) force. Consumers evaluated sensory steaks for juiciness like/dislike, flavor like/dislike, tenderness like/dislike, overall like/dislike, and provided qualitative descriptors. Consumers rated white-fat cow steaks, Australian steaks, and USDA Choice steaks among the greatest (P < 0.05) for overall liking. White-fat cow steaks and yellow-fat cow steaks had lower (P < 0.05) WBS force values than Uruguayan steaks. These findings suggest that tenderloins from sources other than USDA Choice may provide cost-effective options for foodservice markets. Depending on market prices, white-fat cow and Australian carcasses could both serve as economically suitable sources of tenderloins for foodservice establishments while still providing a similar eating experience to USDA Choice carcass steaks.

Meat and Muscle BiologyVol. 9(1)
Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Library Science and Information Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.