Human and automated assessments of children's pronunciation

Assessing children’s pronunciation presents a different set of challenges than assessing adults’ language. Patterns of errors in children’s speech are highly variable, and sources of the errors may be because of developmental stage, speech sound disorders, and language learning status. In school settings, different professionals work with children depending on their needs, including Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) professionals and English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers. Computers, on the other hand, can be trained to identify a wide array of patterns quite quickly. As part of a larger project to create an automated pronunciation diagnostic test for children, we created a test for children 5-7 years old and compared automatic evaluations of 26 children’s pronunciation to human evaluations. While the human evaluations showed high agreement, the automatic mispronunciation detection system was inconsistent in its evaluations, making pattern detection for pronunciation screening impossible. We suggest the development of specialized pronunciation detection systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31274/psllt.18696
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human and automated assessments of children's pronunciation

Evgeny Chukharev‐Hudilainen, Carolyn Richie, Michal Novotný, John M. Levis
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Human and automated assessments of children's pronunciation

Evgeny Chukharev‐Hudilainen, Carolyn Richie, Michal Novotný, John M. Levis
article en

Abstract

Assessing children’s pronunciation presents a different set of challenges than assessing adults’ language. Patterns of errors in children’s speech are highly variable, and sources of the errors may be because of developmental stage, speech sound disorders, and language learning status. In school settings, different professionals work with children depending on their needs, including Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) professionals and English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers. Computers, on the other hand, can be trained to identify a wide array of patterns quite quickly. As part of a larger project to create an automated pronunciation diagnostic test for children, we created a test for children 5-7 years old and compared automatic evaluations of 26 children’s pronunciation to human evaluations. While the human evaluations showed high agreement, the automatic mispronunciation detection system was inconsistent in its evaluations, making pattern detection for pronunciation screening impossible. We suggest the development of specialized pronunciation detection systems.

Iowa State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Iowa State University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human and automated assessments of children's pronunciation — Evgeny Chukharev‐Hudilainen, Carolyn Richie, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS