Disentangling the Dissolution of Ionic and Molecular Compounds: Alternative Conceptions and Teaching Considerations in Chemistry

Students often develop alternative conceptions about fundamental chemistry concepts, particularly regarding the dissolution of ionic, molecular, and acidic compounds. These naïve conceptions, which persist despite formal instruction, may stem from the ways in which chemistry is taught at the high school level. This study investigates how high school chemistry teachers conceptualize and teach dissolution as well as how alternative conceptions relating to these concepts arise in student understanding. Semistructured interviews were conducted with high school chemistry teachers and second-semester general chemistry students to analyze their understanding of dissolution through the lens of Johnstone’s triangle, which emphasizes the interplay between macroscopic observations, submicroscopic interactions, and symbolic representations. Findings indicate that teachers frequently rely on macroscopic demonstrations and submicroscopic particle models while de-emphasizing symbolic representations, particularly balanced chemical equations. Many teachers exhibited fragmented conceptions, often portraying HCl as an ionic compound or omitting key molecular-level processes in describing its dissolution. Furthermore, inconsistencies in textbook explanations and instructional language─such as the interchangeable use of “dissociation” and “ionization”─contribute to the confusion. As a result, students struggle to connect chemical equations with molecular-level processes, reinforcing alternative conceptions that persist in college-level chemistry. This study underscores the importance of helping students integrate symbolic representations alongside macroscopic and submicroscopic models. By explicitly addressing these instructional gaps and refining pedagogical approaches, educators can help students develop a more accurate and meaningful understanding of dissolution, ultimately supporting their progression in chemistry learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00307
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Various Chemistry Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling the Dissolution of Ionic and Molecular Compounds: Alternative Conceptions and Teaching Considerations in Chemistry

Daniela Torres, Binyomin Abrams, Alex Tianyi Xu
2 citations
Journal of Chemical Education
Various Chemistry Research Topics
3.51
article

Disentangling the Dissolution of Ionic and Molecular Compounds: Alternative Conceptions and Teaching Considerations in Chemistry

Daniela Torres, Binyomin Abrams, Alex Tianyi Xu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Students often develop alternative conceptions about fundamental chemistry concepts, particularly regarding the dissolution of ionic, molecular, and acidic compounds. These naïve conceptions, which persist despite formal instruction, may stem from the ways in which chemistry is taught at the high school level. This study investigates how high school chemistry teachers conceptualize and teach dissolution as well as how alternative conceptions relating to these concepts arise in student understanding. Semistructured interviews were conducted with high school chemistry teachers and second-semester general chemistry students to analyze their understanding of dissolution through the lens of Johnstone’s triangle, which emphasizes the interplay between macroscopic observations, submicroscopic interactions, and symbolic representations. Findings indicate that teachers frequently rely on macroscopic demonstrations and submicroscopic particle models while de-emphasizing symbolic representations, particularly balanced chemical equations. Many teachers exhibited fragmented conceptions, often portraying HCl as an ionic compound or omitting key molecular-level processes in describing its dissolution. Furthermore, inconsistencies in textbook explanations and instructional language─such as the interchangeable use of “dissociation” and “ionization”─contribute to the confusion. As a result, students struggle to connect chemical equations with molecular-level processes, reinforcing alternative conceptions that persist in college-level chemistry. This study underscores the importance of helping students integrate symbolic representations alongside macroscopic and submicroscopic models. By explicitly addressing these instructional gaps and refining pedagogical approaches, educators can help students develop a more accurate and meaningful understanding of dissolution, ultimately supporting their progression in chemistry learning.

Journal of Chemical EducationVol. 102(7)
Wheelock College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Various Chemistry Research Topics
3.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.