Identifying Worst Transient Cases and Optimizing Surge Protection for Existing Water Networks

Previous studies of transients in existing water distribution networks (WDNs) accounted for only single worst cases in optimizing surge protection measures, considered only pressure at pipe end nodes, and did not examine the effect of regulating the duration of demand increase. This study presents a comprehensive model for identifying the minimal set of worst transient cases for which optimized surge protection achieves zero Surge Damage Potential Factor (SDPF) for all transient loading cases. The model introduces SDPFP to account for pressure at all computational nodes along pipes, as opposed to relying on SDPFN, which considers pressure at pipe end nodes only. The existing New York Tunnel network was used for model validation and for determining the optimal diameters for additional duplicate pipes to achieve higher pressure under steady-state conditions and protect the network from transients due to demand increase. Compared to previous studies, the model achieved SDPFN=0 with a lower cost for sudden demand increase at a single predefined node. For concurrent sudden demand increase at two nodes, the model identified a total of 8 critical transient cases and corresponding optimum duplicate pipe diameters that achieved SDPFN=0 and SDPFP=0 with 46% and 74% higher costs than previous studies, respectively. The higher costs are necessary; previous studies did not achieve zero SDPFN and SDPFP in 39% and 91% of transient cases, respectively. To reduce duplicate pipe costs, the model was used to examine the effect of regulating the duration for a gradual demand increase. Using only the pipes optimized for steady-state service, the minimum duration for satisfying the transient pressure constraints was identified as ~260 s for the concurrent demand increase scenario. Slight relaxation of the minimum allowable pressure constraint allows a reduction in the duration to 150 s. For applying a demand increase over a smaller duration, duplicate pipes would be needed and can be optimized using the model. These results indicate the advantage of the proposed model in achieving full protection of existing WDNs while maintaining computational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17121816
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Worst Transient Cases and Optimizing Surge Protection for Existing Water Networks

Hamdy A. El-Ghandour, Yehya E. Imam, Amgad S. Elansary, Howayda M. Ahmed
Water
Water Systems and Optimization
article

Identifying Worst Transient Cases and Optimizing Surge Protection for Existing Water Networks

Hamdy A. El-Ghandour, Yehya E. Imam, Amgad S. Elansary, Howayda M. Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Previous studies of transients in existing water distribution networks (WDNs) accounted for only single worst cases in optimizing surge protection measures, considered only pressure at pipe end nodes, and did not examine the effect of regulating the duration of demand increase. This study presents a comprehensive model for identifying the minimal set of worst transient cases for which optimized surge protection achieves zero Surge Damage Potential Factor (SDPF) for all transient loading cases. The model introduces SDPFP to account for pressure at all computational nodes along pipes, as opposed to relying on SDPFN, which considers pressure at pipe end nodes only. The existing New York Tunnel network was used for model validation and for determining the optimal diameters for additional duplicate pipes to achieve higher pressure under steady-state conditions and protect the network from transients due to demand increase. Compared to previous studies, the model achieved SDPFN=0 with a lower cost for sudden demand increase at a single predefined node. For concurrent sudden demand increase at two nodes, the model identified a total of 8 critical transient cases and corresponding optimum duplicate pipe diameters that achieved SDPFN=0 and SDPFP=0 with 46% and 74% higher costs than previous studies, respectively. The higher costs are necessary; previous studies did not achieve zero SDPFN and SDPFP in 39% and 91% of transient cases, respectively. To reduce duplicate pipe costs, the model was used to examine the effect of regulating the duration for a gradual demand increase. Using only the pipes optimized for steady-state service, the minimum duration for satisfying the transient pressure constraints was identified as ~260 s for the concurrent demand increase scenario. Slight relaxation of the minimum allowable pressure constraint allows a reduction in the duration to 150 s. For applying a demand increase over a smaller duration, duplicate pipes would be needed and can be optimized using the model. These results indicate the advantage of the proposed model in achieving full protection of existing WDNs while maintaining computational efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

WaterVol. 17(12)
Damietta University (EG), Cairo University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Water Systems and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.