Optimization of the Qubit Coupled Cluster Ansatz on Classical Computers

Immense interest in quantum computing has prompted the development of electronic structure methods that are suitable for quantum hardware. However, the slow pace at which quantum hardware progresses forces researchers to implement their ideas on classical computers despite the obvious loss of any "quantum advantage." As a result, the so-called <i>q</i>uantum-inspired methods emerge. They allow one to look at the electronic structure problem from a different angle, yet to fully exploit their capacity, efficient implementations are highly desirable. Here, we report two schemes for improving the amplitude optimization in the iterative qubit coupled cluster (iQCC) method: a variational quantum eigensolver-type approach, which is based on the qubit coupled cluster (QCC) Ansatz. Our first scheme approximates the QCC unitary as a sum of symmetrical polynomials of generators up to a given order. The resulting energy expression allows for flexible control of computational complexity via the order parameter. It also guarantees smoothness of trial energies and their derivatives, which is important for gradient-based optimization strategies. The second scheme limits the size of the expansion space in which the QCC unitary is generated. It provides better control of memory requirements but, in general, may lead to the nonsmooth variation of energy estimates upon changes in amplitudes. It can be used, however, to extrapolate energies for a given set of amplitudes toward the exact QCC value. Both schemes allow for a larger number of generators to be included in the QCC form compared to the exact formulation. This reduces the number of iterations in the iQCC method and/or leads to higher accuracy. We assess the capabilities of the new schemes to perform QCC amplitudes optimization for a few molecular systems: dinitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>, 16 qubits), water (H<sub>2</sub>O, 36 qubits), and tris(2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridine) iridium(III), (Ir(F<sub>2</sub>ppy)<sub>3</sub>, 80 qubits).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00345
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of the Qubit Coupled Cluster Ansatz on Classical Computers

S. M. Hosseini Jenab, Ilya G. Ryabinkin, Scott N. Genin
1 links
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Optimization of the Qubit Coupled Cluster Ansatz on Classical Computers

S. M. Hosseini Jenab, Ilya G. Ryabinkin, Scott N. Genin
article en

Abstract

Immense interest in quantum computing has prompted the development of electronic structure methods that are suitable for quantum hardware. However, the slow pace at which quantum hardware progresses forces researchers to implement their ideas on classical computers despite the obvious loss of any "quantum advantage." As a result, the so-called <i>q</i>uantum-inspired methods emerge. They allow one to look at the electronic structure problem from a different angle, yet to fully exploit their capacity, efficient implementations are highly desirable. Here, we report two schemes for improving the amplitude optimization in the iterative qubit coupled cluster (iQCC) method: a variational quantum eigensolver-type approach, which is based on the qubit coupled cluster (QCC) Ansatz. Our first scheme approximates the QCC unitary as a sum of symmetrical polynomials of generators up to a given order. The resulting energy expression allows for flexible control of computational complexity via the order parameter. It also guarantees smoothness of trial energies and their derivatives, which is important for gradient-based optimization strategies. The second scheme limits the size of the expansion space in which the QCC unitary is generated. It provides better control of memory requirements but, in general, may lead to the nonsmooth variation of energy estimates upon changes in amplitudes. It can be used, however, to extrapolate energies for a given set of amplitudes toward the exact QCC value. Both schemes allow for a larger number of generators to be included in the QCC form compared to the exact formulation. This reduces the number of iterations in the iQCC method and/or leads to higher accuracy. We assess the capabilities of the new schemes to perform QCC amplitudes optimization for a few molecular systems: dinitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>, 16 qubits), water (H<sub>2</sub>O, 36 qubits), and tris(2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)pyridine) iridium(III), (Ir(F<sub>2</sub>ppy)<sub>3</sub>, 80 qubits).

Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationVol. 21(13)
OTI Lumionics (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.