Ethnostereotyping of Affirmation and Negation in Languages with Differ-ent Structures

The article is a comparative analysis of linguistic objectification of ethnostereotypical representations of speakers of languages with different structures associated with affirmation and negation. Based on the material of non-closely related Kabardino-Circassian, Russian and English languages, the work of the national mental-lingual apparatus in the process of conceptualization of the surrounding reality is analyzed. The use of both general scientific and linguistic methods, including methods of interpretative, etymological, componential, contextual analysis, as well as comparison and generalization, made it possible to identify universal and linguistic-specific features of the lexical and grammatical explication of ethnocultural information associated with affirmation and negation. A comparative study of languages with different structures allows to reveal an alternative conceptualization of the external world, as well as to identify the features of each language that may remain undisclosed during an autonomous study of individual languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philology & Human
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14258/filichel(2025)1-06
Primary Topic
linguistics and terminology studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnostereotyping of Affirmation and Negation in Languages with Differ-ent Structures

E. V. Maremukova
Philology & Human
linguistics and terminology studies
article

Ethnostereotyping of Affirmation and Negation in Languages with Differ-ent Structures

E. V. Maremukova
article en

Abstract

The article is a comparative analysis of linguistic objectification of ethnostereotypical representations of speakers of languages with different structures associated with affirmation and negation. Based on the material of non-closely related Kabardino-Circassian, Russian and English languages, the work of the national mental-lingual apparatus in the process of conceptualization of the surrounding reality is analyzed. The use of both general scientific and linguistic methods, including methods of interpretative, etymological, componential, contextual analysis, as well as comparison and generalization, made it possible to identify universal and linguistic-specific features of the lexical and grammatical explication of ethnocultural information associated with affirmation and negation. A comparative study of languages with different structures allows to reveal an alternative conceptualization of the external world, as well as to identify the features of each language that may remain undisclosed during an autonomous study of individual languages.

Philology & Human(1)
Bio-Medical Science (South Korea) (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
linguistics and terminology studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethnostereotyping of Affirmation and Negation in Languages with Differ-ent Structures — E. V. Maremukova · Philology & Human (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS