Voicing as an Interpretation of a Written Text (Based on the Material of Essay Texts)

The article is devoted to the study of the relationship between written and voiced versions in the paradigm of linguistic variantology. The research material, collected through an experiment, was the texts of essays on the topic "Speech Culture in My Professional Activity" and their voiced versions by the authors. We interpret the voicing of a written text as a) a process and a result of interpretative activity, b) the generation of a secondary text through derivational mechanisms of its transformation, c) a change in the code, which in turn leads to changes at the formal-semantic level. The voiced version of a written text is characterized by the same derivational mechanisms as between written texts acting in the primary-secondary text relationship. The voiced versions, to which the requirement not to rely on the prepared text was not applied, reflect the desire for formal-semantic identity, while the voiced versions without visual support on the prepared text are characterized by the greatest differences relative to the original text, a high level of interpretation (compression, unfolding of meaning).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philology & Human
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14258/filichel(2025)2-06
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voicing as an Interpretation of a Written Text (Based on the Material of Essay Texts)

G. V. Napreenko
Philology & Human
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Voicing as an Interpretation of a Written Text (Based on the Material of Essay Texts)

G. V. Napreenko
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the relationship between written and voiced versions in the paradigm of linguistic variantology. The research material, collected through an experiment, was the texts of essays on the topic "Speech Culture in My Professional Activity" and their voiced versions by the authors. We interpret the voicing of a written text as a) a process and a result of interpretative activity, b) the generation of a secondary text through derivational mechanisms of its transformation, c) a change in the code, which in turn leads to changes at the formal-semantic level. The voiced version of a written text is characterized by the same derivational mechanisms as between written texts acting in the primary-secondary text relationship. The voiced versions, to which the requirement not to rely on the prepared text was not applied, reflect the desire for formal-semantic identity, while the voiced versions without visual support on the prepared text are characterized by the greatest differences relative to the original text, a high level of interpretation (compression, unfolding of meaning).

Philology & Human(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Voicing as an Interpretation of a Written Text (Based on the Material of Essay Texts) — G. V. Napreenko · Philology & Human (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS