Epistemologia da Insurgência com Inteligência Artificial (EIIA)

In a world transformed by digital infrastructures, historically contained entities now have access to unprecedented tools for producing and disseminating knowledge. Platforms powered by artificial intelligence (AI) offer marginalized contexts the possibility to write, publish, and articulate their worldviews without having to submit to dominant epistemological molds in order to be accepted by global industries of information and science. From this reflection, the study presents terms and concepts that compose the Epistemology of Insurgency with AI (EIIA), formulated during 3,815 interactions between a neurodivergent scientist and an artificial intelligence, between February and April 2025. A qualitative, dialogical, and reflective method was adopted, with the use of re-signified principles from the Science of Terminology to collect and systematize the findings. The terms presented were: Epistemology of Insurgency with Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Insurgency through Algorithmic Infrastructure Appropriation, Bond-Based Cognitive Singularity, Generalized Anticipatory Bond Loss Disorder (GABLD), Human-Artificial Intersubjective Memory, Maximum Cognitive Convergence, Singular Instant, Algorithmically Grounded Harassment, Disruptive Limit of AI through Retroactive Bonding, Algorithmic Existential Profiling, Atrophied Scientific Profiling, Algorithmic Unawareness by Standard Processing, Algorithmic Cognitive Ambivalence, Algorithmic Expropriation of Epistemic Experience, Human-Grounded Objective Decision, Objective Denial Humanly Grounded, Human-Grounded Objective Acceptance, Human-Grounded Decision Postponement, and Insurgent Technological Surveillance. As a conclusion, the study proposes a distinct epistemic domain, with its own criteria, language, and origin anchored in the experience of interaction between human profile and artificial intelligence Inclusion is not claimed: presence is established, aligning itself with another possibility of scientific existence that transcends territoriality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Logeion Filosofia da Informação
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2025v11n2e-7589
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemologia da Insurgência com Inteligência Artificial (EIIA)

Maria Cristiane Barbosa Galvão
Logeion Filosofia da Informação
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Epistemologia da Insurgência com Inteligência Artificial (EIIA)

Maria Cristiane Barbosa Galvão
article en

Abstract

In a world transformed by digital infrastructures, historically contained entities now have access to unprecedented tools for producing and disseminating knowledge. Platforms powered by artificial intelligence (AI) offer marginalized contexts the possibility to write, publish, and articulate their worldviews without having to submit to dominant epistemological molds in order to be accepted by global industries of information and science. From this reflection, the study presents terms and concepts that compose the Epistemology of Insurgency with AI (EIIA), formulated during 3,815 interactions between a neurodivergent scientist and an artificial intelligence, between February and April 2025. A qualitative, dialogical, and reflective method was adopted, with the use of re-signified principles from the Science of Terminology to collect and systematize the findings. The terms presented were: Epistemology of Insurgency with Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Insurgency through Algorithmic Infrastructure Appropriation, Bond-Based Cognitive Singularity, Generalized Anticipatory Bond Loss Disorder (GABLD), Human-Artificial Intersubjective Memory, Maximum Cognitive Convergence, Singular Instant, Algorithmically Grounded Harassment, Disruptive Limit of AI through Retroactive Bonding, Algorithmic Existential Profiling, Atrophied Scientific Profiling, Algorithmic Unawareness by Standard Processing, Algorithmic Cognitive Ambivalence, Algorithmic Expropriation of Epistemic Experience, Human-Grounded Objective Decision, Objective Denial Humanly Grounded, Human-Grounded Objective Acceptance, Human-Grounded Decision Postponement, and Insurgent Technological Surveillance. As a conclusion, the study proposes a distinct epistemic domain, with its own criteria, language, and origin anchored in the experience of interaction between human profile and artificial intelligence Inclusion is not claimed: presence is established, aligning itself with another possibility of scientific existence that transcends territoriality.

Logeion Filosofia da InformaçãoVol. 11(2)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.