Where is the “Global South” located in scientific research?

Although the term “Global South” has been increasingly invoked by heads of State as a call for enhanced multilateralism and institutional reform, its academic conceptualization remains underdeveloped. Therefore, we investigate how and where scientific knowledge about the Global South is produced, using a meta-analysis of around 17,000 articles [1994–2024] indexed in Scopus database. The paper shows that authors and funding are predominantly from Global North institutions, particularly the United States. However, rising powers are increasingly active contributors, notably South Africa, India, China and Brazil. The most frequent research topics include globalization, COVID-19, climate change, gender issues, neoliberalism, decolonization and sustainability. The results also reveal the centrality of Africa in the debate, and the underrepresentation of Global South institutions in leading journals. The conclusion calls for more scientific collaboration to improve visibility of knowledge produced in the Global South institutions and suggests that ESG may be a key player.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Governance
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100269
Citations
7
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
62.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where is the “Global South” located in scientific research?

Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau, Pierre Mazzéga, Devi M. Rugmini
7 citations
Earth System Governance
African cultural and philosophical studies
62.48
article

Where is the “Global South” located in scientific research?

Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau, Pierre Mazzéga, Devi M. Rugmini
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Although the term “Global South” has been increasingly invoked by heads of State as a call for enhanced multilateralism and institutional reform, its academic conceptualization remains underdeveloped. Therefore, we investigate how and where scientific knowledge about the Global South is produced, using a meta-analysis of around 17,000 articles [1994–2024] indexed in Scopus database. The paper shows that authors and funding are predominantly from Global North institutions, particularly the United States. However, rising powers are increasingly active contributors, notably South Africa, India, China and Brazil. The most frequent research topics include globalization, COVID-19, climate change, gender issues, neoliberalism, decolonization and sustainability. The results also reveal the centrality of Africa in the debate, and the underrepresentation of Global South institutions in leading journals. The conclusion calls for more scientific collaboration to improve visibility of knowledge produced in the Global South institutions and suggests that ESG may be a key player.

Earth System GovernanceVol. 25
Institute on Governance (CA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Universidade de Brasília (BR), University of Kerala (IN), University of Strathclyde (GB), Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités Sociétés Territoires (FR), Universidade Católica Dom Bosco (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
African cultural and philosophical studies
62.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Where is the “Global South” located in scientific research? — Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau, Pierre Mazzéga, et al. · Earth System Governance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS