Classical-quantum scattering

Abstract We analyze the framework recently proposed by Oppenheim et al (2023 Nat. Commun. 14 ; 2023 Phys. Rev. X 13 041040; arXiv:2302.07283 [gr-qc]; 2023 J. High Energy Phys. JHEP08(2023)163) to model relativistic quantum fields coupled to relativistic, classical, stochastic fields (in particular, as a model of quantum matter coupled to ‘classical gravity’). Perhaps surprisingly, we find that we can define and calculate scattering probabilities which are Lorentz-covariant and conserve total probability, at least at tree level. As a concrete example, we analyze <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo accent="false" stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> scattering of quantum matter mediated by a classical Yukawa field. Mapping this to a gravitational coupling in the non-relativistic limit, and assuming that we can treat large objects as point masses, we find that the simplest possible ‘classical-quantum’ gravity theory constructed this way gives predictions for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo accent="false" stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> gravitational scattering which are inconsistent with simple observations of, e.g. spacecraft undergoing slingshot maneuvers. We comment on lessons learned for attempts to couple quantum matter to ‘non-quantum’ gravity, or more generally, for attempts to couple relativistic quantum and classical systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ade589
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classical-quantum scattering

Daniel Carney, Akira Matsumura
1 citations
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Quantum optics and atomic interactions
1.25
article

Classical-quantum scattering

Daniel Carney, Akira Matsumura
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We analyze the framework recently proposed by Oppenheim et al (2023 Nat. Commun. 14 ; 2023 Phys. Rev. X 13 041040; arXiv:2302.07283 [gr-qc]; 2023 J. High Energy Phys. JHEP08(2023)163) to model relativistic quantum fields coupled to relativistic, classical, stochastic fields (in particular, as a model of quantum matter coupled to ‘classical gravity’). Perhaps surprisingly, we find that we can define and calculate scattering probabilities which are Lorentz-covariant and conserve total probability, at least at tree level. As a concrete example, we analyze <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo accent="false" stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> scattering of quantum matter mediated by a classical Yukawa field. Mapping this to a gravitational coupling in the non-relativistic limit, and assuming that we can treat large objects as point masses, we find that the simplest possible ‘classical-quantum’ gravity theory constructed this way gives predictions for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo accent="false" stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> gravitational scattering which are inconsistent with simple observations of, e.g. spacecraft undergoing slingshot maneuvers. We comment on lessons learned for attempts to couple quantum matter to ‘non-quantum’ gravity, or more generally, for attempts to couple relativistic quantum and classical systems.

Classical and Quantum GravityVol. 42(13)
Kyushu University (JP), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Heising-Simons Foundation, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, High Energy Physics
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Quantum optics and atomic interactions
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.