Does Financial Statement Comparability Reduce Differences in Sentiment‐induced Investor Trading Behaviour?

This study examines whether comparable financial information can mitigate differences between individual and institutional investors’ trading behaviour, particularly behaviour that is shaped by investor sentiment. The results indicate that the higher the comparability, the smaller the gap in trading behaviour driven by investor sentiment between institutional and individual investors. In particular, the tendency of individual investors to purchase stocks associated with high investor sentiment is mitigated by comparable financial information. However, the study also reveals that comparability does not significantly affect institutional investors’ investment decisions. Furthermore, the effect of comparability in minimizing differences in trading behaviours resulting from investor sentiment is more pronounced for firms that are difficult to evaluate (such as young, volatile, non‐dividend‐paying firms with extreme market‐to‐book ratios, and those with limited analyst coverage) as well as firms operating in less competitive industries. Overall, these findings collectively indicate that comparability benefits investors and highlights which types of investors stand to gain from it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Abacus
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12371
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Financial Statement Comparability Reduce Differences in Sentiment‐induced Investor Trading Behaviour?

Eun Hye Jo, Jung Wha Lee
Abacus
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Does Financial Statement Comparability Reduce Differences in Sentiment‐induced Investor Trading Behaviour?

Eun Hye Jo, Jung Wha Lee
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether comparable financial information can mitigate differences between individual and institutional investors’ trading behaviour, particularly behaviour that is shaped by investor sentiment. The results indicate that the higher the comparability, the smaller the gap in trading behaviour driven by investor sentiment between institutional and individual investors. In particular, the tendency of individual investors to purchase stocks associated with high investor sentiment is mitigated by comparable financial information. However, the study also reveals that comparability does not significantly affect institutional investors’ investment decisions. Furthermore, the effect of comparability in minimizing differences in trading behaviours resulting from investor sentiment is more pronounced for firms that are difficult to evaluate (such as young, volatile, non‐dividend‐paying firms with extreme market‐to‐book ratios, and those with limited analyst coverage) as well as firms operating in less competitive industries. Overall, these findings collectively indicate that comparability benefits investors and highlights which types of investors stand to gain from it.

Abacus
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.