Drive mechanisms and hydrogen recovery in underground storage: a material balance and simulation approach

Investigating the primary drive mechanisms in underground hydrogen storage (UHS) is crucial for optimizing hydrogen recovery from geological formations. In this study, we used a 3D heterogeneous geological model to assess the dynamics of hydrogen storage in an aquifer under various hydrodynamic and geological conditions, using material balance to quantify the contribution of different production mechanisms including gas expansion, water influx, exsolution, and the compressibility of rock and water. Our findings indicate that gas expansion and rock compressibility are the predominant mechanisms driving hydrogen recovery for closed boundary conditions with minimal aquifer support, whereas water influx dominates when there is substantial aquifer connectivity. Exsolution as a driving force has a negligible impact on hydrogen recovery, simplifying the modelling of storage dynamics. Furthermore, cushion gas injection was found to notably improve gas expansion under open boundary conditions, optimizing hydrogen recovery during the initial production phases. The study underscores the influence of uncertain parameters and processes on hydrogen storage efficiency, offering critical insights for the design of UHS and identifying key reservoir and fluid properties necessary for robust management. • Hydrogen recovery mechanisms were evaluated using a heterogeneous geological model. • A material balance was derived for UHS to quantify different mechanism contributions. • Gas expansion and rock compressibility dominated recovery under closed boundary conditions. • Water influx was the dominant recovery mechanism under open boundary conditions. • Exsolution had minimal influence on hydrogen recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.06.081
Citations
6
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drive mechanisms and hydrogen recovery in underground storage: a material balance and simulation approach

Branko Bijeljic, Martin J. Blunt, Ibrahim A. Alobaidan
6 citations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
4.79
article

Drive mechanisms and hydrogen recovery in underground storage: a material balance and simulation approach

Branko Bijeljic, Martin J. Blunt, Ibrahim A. Alobaidan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Investigating the primary drive mechanisms in underground hydrogen storage (UHS) is crucial for optimizing hydrogen recovery from geological formations. In this study, we used a 3D heterogeneous geological model to assess the dynamics of hydrogen storage in an aquifer under various hydrodynamic and geological conditions, using material balance to quantify the contribution of different production mechanisms including gas expansion, water influx, exsolution, and the compressibility of rock and water. Our findings indicate that gas expansion and rock compressibility are the predominant mechanisms driving hydrogen recovery for closed boundary conditions with minimal aquifer support, whereas water influx dominates when there is substantial aquifer connectivity. Exsolution as a driving force has a negligible impact on hydrogen recovery, simplifying the modelling of storage dynamics. Furthermore, cushion gas injection was found to notably improve gas expansion under open boundary conditions, optimizing hydrogen recovery during the initial production phases. The study underscores the influence of uncertain parameters and processes on hydrogen storage efficiency, offering critical insights for the design of UHS and identifying key reservoir and fluid properties necessary for robust management. • Hydrogen recovery mechanisms were evaluated using a heterogeneous geological model. • A material balance was derived for UHS to quantify different mechanism contributions. • Gas expansion and rock compressibility dominated recovery under closed boundary conditions. • Water influx was the dominant recovery mechanism under open boundary conditions. • Exsolution had minimal influence on hydrogen recovery.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 146
Imperial College London (GB)
Saudi Aramco
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
4.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.