A comparative analysis of ecosystem services perceptions across two regions in Eastern Africa and Central Europe

• In East Africa and Central Europe, perceptions of ecosystem services (ES) were investigated. • Perceptions vary according to origin, education, gender, and age. • Provisioning and regulating & maintenance ES were perceived as more important in Eastern Africa. • Respondents in Central Europe attribute higher importance to cultural ES. Ecosystem services (ES) are crucial for livelihoods, the economy and good quality of life, making them essential for sustaining human well-being. However, perceptions of ES can vary according to economic and social factors. In this study, we compare people’s perceptions of ES across developing and developed countries by exploring local communities and visitors’ socio-cultural values attached to ES in the Eastern Province of Zambia (Eastern Africa) and Tyrol (Central Europe) using questionnaire surveys (N = 243). The results indicate that the respondents’ region of origin, education level, gender, age, and socio-economic status play a significant role in the perception of ES. Provisioning, regulation & maintenance ES are perceived as generally more important in Eastern Africa than in Central Europe, whereas respondents in Central Europe attribute higher importance to cultural ES. For some ES, gender type, age group, living place, and educational level also influence perception. These socio- economic differences are underlined by the ranking of ES in terms of personal importance. In Eastern Africa, the ES ‘food from agriculture’, ‘natural hazard protection’, ‘prevention of water scarcity’ and ‘climate regulation’ are particularly important. In Europe, the most frequently chosen ES are ‘opportunity for leisure activities’ and ‘peaceful places and tranquillity’. Our findings provide insights into the socio-cultural importance of benefits provided by nature across two socio-economic different contexts, suggesting that decision-making processes will need be responsive to context differences and different needs depending on economic and social background.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101747
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of ecosystem services perceptions across two regions in Eastern Africa and Central Europe

Mabvuto Mwanza, Uta Schirpke, Erich Tasser, Brenda Maria Zoderer et al.
4 citations
Ecosystem Services
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.42
article

A comparative analysis of ecosystem services perceptions across two regions in Eastern Africa and Central Europe

Mabvuto Mwanza, Uta Schirpke, Erich Tasser, Brenda Maria Zoderer, Katrin Kuhlmann, Gelson Tembo, Ulrike Tappeiner, Markus Schermer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• In East Africa and Central Europe, perceptions of ecosystem services (ES) were investigated. • Perceptions vary according to origin, education, gender, and age. • Provisioning and regulating & maintenance ES were perceived as more important in Eastern Africa. • Respondents in Central Europe attribute higher importance to cultural ES. Ecosystem services (ES) are crucial for livelihoods, the economy and good quality of life, making them essential for sustaining human well-being. However, perceptions of ES can vary according to economic and social factors. In this study, we compare people’s perceptions of ES across developing and developed countries by exploring local communities and visitors’ socio-cultural values attached to ES in the Eastern Province of Zambia (Eastern Africa) and Tyrol (Central Europe) using questionnaire surveys (N = 243). The results indicate that the respondents’ region of origin, education level, gender, age, and socio-economic status play a significant role in the perception of ES. Provisioning, regulation & maintenance ES are perceived as generally more important in Eastern Africa than in Central Europe, whereas respondents in Central Europe attribute higher importance to cultural ES. For some ES, gender type, age group, living place, and educational level also influence perception. These socio- economic differences are underlined by the ranking of ES in terms of personal importance. In Eastern Africa, the ES ‘food from agriculture’, ‘natural hazard protection’, ‘prevention of water scarcity’ and ‘climate regulation’ are particularly important. In Europe, the most frequently chosen ES are ‘opportunity for leisure activities’ and ‘peaceful places and tranquillity’. Our findings provide insights into the socio-cultural importance of benefits provided by nature across two socio-economic different contexts, suggesting that decision-making processes will need be responsive to context differences and different needs depending on economic and social background.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 74
Landscape Institute (GB), Eurac Research (IT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), University of Zambia (ZM), Zambia Catholic University (ZM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.