FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROAHCES FOR OPTIMAL SELECTION OF EMBEDDED SYSTEMS FOR AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATED LIGHT VEHICLES

Selecting the best type of embedded system for an autonomous navigated light vehicle is complicated. The complexity arises from the need to consider criteria such as navigation accuracy, processing speed, power consumption, compatibility, and reliability when building an autonomous navigated light vehicle. This study evaluates three types of embedded systems: Arduino, Raspberry Pi, and NVIDIA Jetson. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and select the best embedded system for an autonomous navigated light vehicle. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS), and the Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting (FSAW) methods were used to test and choose from between the three types of embedded systems. Each method has its advantages. The FAHP has the advantage of determining the weight of the criteria hierarchically. The F-TOPSIS and FSAW methods were used to sort and evaluate alternatives based on the set criteria. The study’s results showed that of the three methods used, Raspberry Pi is the best alternative, followed by NVIDIA Jetson and Arduino. The findings showed that Raspberry Pi excelled in navigation accuracy and processing speed, NVIDIA Jetson excelled in reliability, and Arduino excelled in power consumption and compatibility. Fuzzy MCDM is an appropriate method to use to select embedded systems for autonomous navigated light vehicles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v17i2.1258
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROAHCES FOR OPTIMAL SELECTION OF EMBEDDED SYSTEMS FOR AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATED LIGHT VEHICLES

Maspiyah Maspiyah, Sayyidul Aulia Alamsyah, I Gusti Putu Asto Buditjahjanto, Gitut Sudarto et al.
2 citations
International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
2.55
article

FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROAHCES FOR OPTIMAL SELECTION OF EMBEDDED SYSTEMS FOR AUTONOMOUS NAVIGATED LIGHT VEHICLES

Maspiyah Maspiyah, Sayyidul Aulia Alamsyah, I Gusti Putu Asto Buditjahjanto, Gitut Sudarto, Satria Riagung Lazuardi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Selecting the best type of embedded system for an autonomous navigated light vehicle is complicated. The complexity arises from the need to consider criteria such as navigation accuracy, processing speed, power consumption, compatibility, and reliability when building an autonomous navigated light vehicle. This study evaluates three types of embedded systems: Arduino, Raspberry Pi, and NVIDIA Jetson. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and select the best embedded system for an autonomous navigated light vehicle. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), the Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS), and the Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting (FSAW) methods were used to test and choose from between the three types of embedded systems. Each method has its advantages. The FAHP has the advantage of determining the weight of the criteria hierarchically. The F-TOPSIS and FSAW methods were used to sort and evaluate alternatives based on the set criteria. The study’s results showed that of the three methods used, Raspberry Pi is the best alternative, followed by NVIDIA Jetson and Arduino. The findings showed that Raspberry Pi excelled in navigation accuracy and processing speed, NVIDIA Jetson excelled in reliability, and Arduino excelled in power consumption and compatibility. Fuzzy MCDM is an appropriate method to use to select embedded systems for autonomous navigated light vehicles.

International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessVol. 17(2)
Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.