Can ETS pricing policies and clean subsidy policies lead to a cleaner power generation sector

China currently implements an intensity-based carbon emissions trading system (ETS), a pricing mechanism that limits emissions while subsidizing output. This system has helped mitigate production losses associated with emission reductions. However, it tends to preserve traditional energy structures and impedes the transition toward cleaner development, particularly given China's reliance on inexpensive coal and the higher cost of cleaner energy sources. In response, China is actively considering new pricing strategies aimed at reducing output subsidies. This study develops a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model that integrates the ETS with the power sector to evaluate how changes in pricing policies and clean energy subsidies influence emissions reduction and energy transition. The results indicate that: (i) transitioning to an aggregate-based pricing system significantly reduces emissions but also suppresses electricity generation due to insufficient incentives for clean energy adoption; (ii) increasing subsidies for clean energy promotes technological transition but has a limited impact on emissions, as it does not increase the relative cost of coal-fired power; and (iii) combining pricing reform with clean energy subsidies achieves greater emissions reductions and better preserves electricity output than either policy alone. • DSGE is used to analyze ETS and mitigation strategies, using data on power generation in China from 1999 to 2024. • Strict ETS pricing reduces emissions but does not support a clean transition. • Clean subsidies support the clean transition but fail to reduce emissions. • Knowledge of clean power generation lags behind that of dirty power generation, and the transition is hampered. • This paper emphasizes the usefulness of progressive combination policies for emission reduction and transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114736
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can ETS pricing policies and clean subsidy policies lead to a cleaner power generation sector

R. -Y. Chen, Yuqin Du, Boyang Li
7 citations
Energy Policy
Climate Change Policy and Economics
21.92
article

Can ETS pricing policies and clean subsidy policies lead to a cleaner power generation sector

R. -Y. Chen, Yuqin Du, Boyang Li
article en
7 citations

Abstract

China currently implements an intensity-based carbon emissions trading system (ETS), a pricing mechanism that limits emissions while subsidizing output. This system has helped mitigate production losses associated with emission reductions. However, it tends to preserve traditional energy structures and impedes the transition toward cleaner development, particularly given China's reliance on inexpensive coal and the higher cost of cleaner energy sources. In response, China is actively considering new pricing strategies aimed at reducing output subsidies. This study develops a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model that integrates the ETS with the power sector to evaluate how changes in pricing policies and clean energy subsidies influence emissions reduction and energy transition. The results indicate that: (i) transitioning to an aggregate-based pricing system significantly reduces emissions but also suppresses electricity generation due to insufficient incentives for clean energy adoption; (ii) increasing subsidies for clean energy promotes technological transition but has a limited impact on emissions, as it does not increase the relative cost of coal-fired power; and (iii) combining pricing reform with clean energy subsidies achieves greater emissions reductions and better preserves electricity output than either policy alone. • DSGE is used to analyze ETS and mitigation strategies, using data on power generation in China from 1999 to 2024. • Strict ETS pricing reduces emissions but does not support a clean transition. • Clean subsidies support the clean transition but fail to reduce emissions. • Knowledge of clean power generation lags behind that of dirty power generation, and the transition is hampered. • This paper emphasizes the usefulness of progressive combination policies for emission reduction and transition.

Energy PolicyVol. 206
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
21.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can ETS pricing policies and clean subsidy policies lead to a cleaner power generation sector — R. -Y. Chen, Yuqin Du, et al. · Energy Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS