Strength, microhardness, and microstructure analysis of 316L stainless steel manufactured via hybrid laser wire and laser powder bed additive

Additive manufacturing techniques including laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and laser wire direct energy deposition (LWDED) can be integrated into a hybrid additive manufacturing (AM) process. Combining LWDED with LPBF leverages their complementary strengths to achieve optimized part geometries and properties, as well as making it possible to repair LPBF parts using LWDED. In this study, LWDED 316L SS blocks were deposited onto both LPBF 316L SS and conventional cold-rolled and annealed (CRA) 316L SS substrates to investigate the resulting microstructure and properties when these techniques are combined. Mechanical properties, including microhardness and tensile strength, were compared with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) characterization of the microstructure. The tensile strength of the hybrid AM LPBF-LWDED (σ y = 338 MPa) was superior to that of the CRA-LWDED AM (σ y = 326 MPa) or LWDED (σ y = 312 MPa) alone. The microhardness of the LWDED region was greatest at the interface with the CRA substrate (210 ± 5 HV) and gradually decreased along the build direction. In contrast, the LWDED microhardness at the interface with the LPBF substrate (193 ± 6 HV) was comparable to the bulk LWDED value and remained constant along the build direction without significant variation. The disparity in the LWDED microhardness among the two substrates was attributed to a faster cooling rate, due to higher thermal conductivity in the CRA substrate than in LPBF. These results demonstrate a successful path towards LPBF-LWDED hybrid AM and its advantages over conventional CRA-LWDED. • LWDED and LPBF were combined in a hybrid additive manufacturing process for 316L SS. • The hybrid LPBF-LWDED sample had better strength than conventional CRA-LWDED. • The microhardness along the LPBF-LWDED interface had superior homogeneity. • Strengthening mechanisms were altered by the thermal conductivity of the substrate. • LPBF-LWDED is suitable for hybrid additive manufacturing or repair of LPBF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.06.037
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strength, microhardness, and microstructure analysis of 316L stainless steel manufactured via hybrid laser wire and laser powder bed additive

Katherine Murphy, Quinn Campbell, Thomas Keller, Andrew Neils et al.
6 citations
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
4.28
article

Strength, microhardness, and microstructure analysis of 316L stainless steel manufactured via hybrid laser wire and laser powder bed additive

Katherine Murphy, Quinn Campbell, Thomas Keller, Andrew Neils, Nathan Post, Jack Lesko, Ogheneyunume Fitchorova, David Hayrikyan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Additive manufacturing techniques including laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and laser wire direct energy deposition (LWDED) can be integrated into a hybrid additive manufacturing (AM) process. Combining LWDED with LPBF leverages their complementary strengths to achieve optimized part geometries and properties, as well as making it possible to repair LPBF parts using LWDED. In this study, LWDED 316L SS blocks were deposited onto both LPBF 316L SS and conventional cold-rolled and annealed (CRA) 316L SS substrates to investigate the resulting microstructure and properties when these techniques are combined. Mechanical properties, including microhardness and tensile strength, were compared with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) characterization of the microstructure. The tensile strength of the hybrid AM LPBF-LWDED (σ y = 338 MPa) was superior to that of the CRA-LWDED AM (σ y = 326 MPa) or LWDED (σ y = 312 MPa) alone. The microhardness of the LWDED region was greatest at the interface with the CRA substrate (210 ± 5 HV) and gradually decreased along the build direction. In contrast, the LWDED microhardness at the interface with the LPBF substrate (193 ± 6 HV) was comparable to the bulk LWDED value and remained constant along the build direction without significant variation. The disparity in the LWDED microhardness among the two substrates was attributed to a faster cooling rate, due to higher thermal conductivity in the CRA substrate than in LPBF. These results demonstrate a successful path towards LPBF-LWDED hybrid AM and its advantages over conventional CRA-LWDED. • LWDED and LPBF were combined in a hybrid additive manufacturing process for 316L SS. • The hybrid LPBF-LWDED sample had better strength than conventional CRA-LWDED. • The microhardness along the LPBF-LWDED interface had superior homogeneity. • Strengthening mechanisms were altered by the thermal conductivity of the substrate. • LPBF-LWDED is suitable for hybrid additive manufacturing or repair of LPBF.

Journal of Manufacturing ProcessesVol. 150
Brunswick (United States) (US), Eastern University (BD)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Maine Space Grant Consortium
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
4.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.