Explainable AI-driven evaluation of plant protein rheology using tree-based and Gaussian process machine learning models

In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the explainability of Decision Tree Regressor (DTR) and Gaussian Process Regressor (GPR) models in predicting the shear stress and viscosity of sesame protein isolate (SPI) systems, employing explainable machine learning (EML) techniques to elucidate complex, nonlinear relationships among processing parameters. SPI samples were processed across pressure levels ranging from 0 to 100 MPa and ion concentration (IC) values from 0 to 200 mM. DTR model accurately predicted shear stress ( R 2 = 0.999), while a GPR model achieved high performance for viscosity prediction ( R 2 = 0.9925). Formally, the modeling task is framed as learning a predicting mapping function f : R p → R , where x ∈ R p denotes the vector of predictors (pressure, IC, shear rate) and y ∈ R is the target variable (shear stress or viscosity), by minimizing a loss function such as mean squared error. Interpretation of model predictions using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), permutation importance, and partial dependence analysis revealed that pressure and IC are the most influential factors affecting shear stress and viscosity, with pressure inducing protein conformational changes that impact rheological properties. The shear rate exhibited a lesser direct impact within the systems examined. Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) from the DTR model revealed strong, nearly linear positive relationships between pressure and shear stress, while the GPR model depicted more nuanced responses, highlighting the models’ differing sensitivities. Variance-Based Sensitivity Indices (VBSIs) further quantified these influences, with pressure and IC showing higher sensitivity scores in the DTR model compared to the GPR model. Permutation importance and SHAP interaction analyses corroborated these results, emphasizing the dominant role of pressure and IC, both independently and interactively, in determining shear stress. In contrast, viscosity predictions were influenced by more distributed and subtle interactions among all features. Employing explainable machine learning techniques enables a comprehensive understanding of feature relevance in complex, nonlinear rheological systems, facilitating the elucidation of viscosity development in sesame protein systems through rheological indices. This approach ensures no bias toward formulation composition and applied pressure, offering valuable insights for optimizing formulation and processing conditions in food applications to enhance the functional properties of SPI-based products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103565
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Statistical and Computational Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable AI-driven evaluation of plant protein rheology using tree-based and Gaussian process machine learning models

Furkan Türker Sarıcaoğlu, Mustafa Tahsin Yılmaz, Ahmad H. Milyani, Abdulaziz S. Alkabaa et al.
4 citations
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Statistical and Computational Modeling
9.92
article

Explainable AI-driven evaluation of plant protein rheology using tree-based and Gaussian process machine learning models

Furkan Türker Sarıcaoğlu, Mustafa Tahsin Yılmaz, Ahmad H. Milyani, Abdulaziz S. Alkabaa, Osman Gül, Kemal Polat, Salman Badurayq
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of the explainability of Decision Tree Regressor (DTR) and Gaussian Process Regressor (GPR) models in predicting the shear stress and viscosity of sesame protein isolate (SPI) systems, employing explainable machine learning (EML) techniques to elucidate complex, nonlinear relationships among processing parameters. SPI samples were processed across pressure levels ranging from 0 to 100 MPa and ion concentration (IC) values from 0 to 200 mM. DTR model accurately predicted shear stress ( R 2 = 0.999), while a GPR model achieved high performance for viscosity prediction ( R 2 = 0.9925). Formally, the modeling task is framed as learning a predicting mapping function f : R p → R , where x ∈ R p denotes the vector of predictors (pressure, IC, shear rate) and y ∈ R is the target variable (shear stress or viscosity), by minimizing a loss function such as mean squared error. Interpretation of model predictions using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), permutation importance, and partial dependence analysis revealed that pressure and IC are the most influential factors affecting shear stress and viscosity, with pressure inducing protein conformational changes that impact rheological properties. The shear rate exhibited a lesser direct impact within the systems examined. Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) from the DTR model revealed strong, nearly linear positive relationships between pressure and shear stress, while the GPR model depicted more nuanced responses, highlighting the models’ differing sensitivities. Variance-Based Sensitivity Indices (VBSIs) further quantified these influences, with pressure and IC showing higher sensitivity scores in the DTR model compared to the GPR model. Permutation importance and SHAP interaction analyses corroborated these results, emphasizing the dominant role of pressure and IC, both independently and interactively, in determining shear stress. In contrast, viscosity predictions were influenced by more distributed and subtle interactions among all features. Employing explainable machine learning techniques enables a comprehensive understanding of feature relevance in complex, nonlinear rheological systems, facilitating the elucidation of viscosity development in sesame protein systems through rheological indices. This approach ensures no bias toward formulation composition and applied pressure, offering valuable insights for optimizing formulation and processing conditions in food applications to enhance the functional properties of SPI-based products.

Ain Shams Engineering JournalVol. 16(9)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Bursa Technical University (TR), University of Business and Technology (SA), Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR), Kastamonu University (TR)
King Abdulaziz University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Statistical and Computational Modeling
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.