Biodiversity Credits: An Overview of the Current State, Future Opportunities, and Potential Pitfalls

ABSTRACT Biodiversity credits are an emerging vehicle for pro‐environmental financing, yet much uncertainty remains around how and when they could boost biodiversity conservation. Here we define what biodiversity credits are and explore impact pathways through a proposed theory of change. Based on evidence from 34 pilot projects and a review of lessons from related market‐based incentives for conservation, we further explore potential opportunities and pitfalls, including future supply and demand, bundling/stacking options, and needed social safeguards. We explore how biodiversity credits can better tackle challenges linked to additionality, permanence, leakage, and commensurability. While new monitoring technologies can help quantify biodiversity, trade‐offs exist between simple metrics enabling liquid markets and costlier ones more adequately representing biodiversity. To avoid past mistakes, sound credit design and implementation require more robust crediting baselines, standards, governance, and impact evaluation. Quality credits will be more expensive than those cutting integrity corners, which may dampen the expected biodiversity credit boom.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70018
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
43.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity Credits: An Overview of the Current State, Future Opportunities, and Potential Pitfalls

Bo Jellesmark Thorsen, Yitagesu Tekle Tegegne, Megan Evans, Andrea Pacheco et al.
19 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Environmental Conservation and Management
43.60
article

Biodiversity Credits: An Overview of the Current State, Future Opportunities, and Potential Pitfalls

Bo Jellesmark Thorsen, Yitagesu Tekle Tegegne, Megan Evans, Andrea Pacheco, Bart Muys, Sophus zu Ermgassen, Thomas White, Martine Maron, Trishna Dutta, Joseph W. Bull, Cecilia Fraccaroli, Julia P. G. Jones, Sven Wunder, Alison Eyres, Asger Strange Olesen, Han Zhang, Thomas Swinfield
article en
19 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Biodiversity credits are an emerging vehicle for pro‐environmental financing, yet much uncertainty remains around how and when they could boost biodiversity conservation. Here we define what biodiversity credits are and explore impact pathways through a proposed theory of change. Based on evidence from 34 pilot projects and a review of lessons from related market‐based incentives for conservation, we further explore potential opportunities and pitfalls, including future supply and demand, bundling/stacking options, and needed social safeguards. We explore how biodiversity credits can better tackle challenges linked to additionality, permanence, leakage, and commensurability. While new monitoring technologies can help quantify biodiversity, trade‐offs exist between simple metrics enabling liquid markets and costlier ones more adequately representing biodiversity. To avoid past mistakes, sound credit design and implementation require more robust crediting baselines, standards, governance, and impact evaluation. Quality credits will be more expensive than those cutting integrity corners, which may dampen the expected biodiversity credit boom.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 34(7)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Bonn (DE), Bangor University (GB), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Utrecht University (NL), University of Cambridge (GB), Leverhulme Trust (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Oxford (GB), European Forest Institute (ES), European Forest Institute (DE), UNSW Canberra, Northwest A&F University (CN), Center for International Forestry Research (ID), KU Leuven (BE)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, National Social Science Fund of China, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Environmental Conservation and Management
43.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.