A comparative study of auditory processing in Kurdish-Turkish bilinguals versus Turkish monolinguals

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare inhibitory control and auditory processing skills in monolingual (ML) and bilingual (BL) individuals. Methods The study included 15 Turkish ML and 15 Kurdish-Turkish BL individuals, whose native language is Kurdish. All subjects underwent several assessments, including the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT), frequency pattern test (FPT) and duration pattern test (DPT), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), P1-N1-P2 and P300 test, and the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test (TURMatrix). Results There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the SCWT, FPT, DPT, P1-N1, and P300 results. However, the amplitudes of the /m/ and /g/ phonemes of P2 wave were significantly lower in the BL group. Additionally, the adaptive-in-noise TURMatrix scores were significantly better for the ML group. Conclusions The results indicated that BL individuals required a higher signal-to-noise ratio when the target message was masked by noise, and that that BL language experience did not provide an overall advantage affecting inhibitory control and auditory processing outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00844-0
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of auditory processing in Kurdish-Turkish bilinguals versus Turkish monolinguals

Eyyüp Kara, Halide Çetin Kara, Burcu Deniz, Işık Baltacı
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

A comparative study of auditory processing in Kurdish-Turkish bilinguals versus Turkish monolinguals

Eyyüp Kara, Halide Çetin Kara, Burcu Deniz, Işık Baltacı
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare inhibitory control and auditory processing skills in monolingual (ML) and bilingual (BL) individuals. Methods The study included 15 Turkish ML and 15 Kurdish-Turkish BL individuals, whose native language is Kurdish. All subjects underwent several assessments, including the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT), frequency pattern test (FPT) and duration pattern test (DPT), Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), P1-N1-P2 and P300 test, and the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test (TURMatrix). Results There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the SCWT, FPT, DPT, P1-N1, and P300 results. However, the amplitudes of the /m/ and /g/ phonemes of P2 wave were significantly lower in the BL group. Additionally, the adaptive-in-noise TURMatrix scores were significantly better for the ML group. Conclusions The results indicated that BL individuals required a higher signal-to-noise ratio when the target message was masked by noise, and that that BL language experience did not provide an overall advantage affecting inhibitory control and auditory processing outcomes.

The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 41(1)
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.