Revisiting Security Practices for Github Actions Workflows

GitHub Actions, a built-in CI/CD service of GitHub released in 2019, has become one of the most widely adopted tools among developers for automating software development workflows. This popularity, however, brings security challenges, as vulnerable workflows can expose repositories and software supply chains to significant risks. Existing studies have highlighted several types of potential security issues. Over the past few years, GitHub has been constantly promoting better security practices, and developers have gained experience in using GitHub Actions. Investigating how developers' practices for handling GitHub Actions security have changed over time could offer valuable insights for further strengthening the security of these workflows. In this study, we analyzed non-optimal security practices in 18,938 workflows from 5,246 active GitHub repositories. By comparing the prevalence of issues spotted in two different years (2022 and 2024), we find that the instances of No Permissions Specified have significantly reduced as more developers now explicitly define permissions in their workflows. However, other issues, such as Confidential Data Disclosure, remain prevalent, underscoring the need for continued vigilance and further research in this domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icpc66645.2025.00016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Security Practices for Github Actions Workflows

Bin Lin, Jiangnan Huang
1 citations
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
article

Revisiting Security Practices for Github Actions Workflows

Bin Lin, Jiangnan Huang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

GitHub Actions, a built-in CI/CD service of GitHub released in 2019, has become one of the most widely adopted tools among developers for automating software development workflows. This popularity, however, brings security challenges, as vulnerable workflows can expose repositories and software supply chains to significant risks. Existing studies have highlighted several types of potential security issues. Over the past few years, GitHub has been constantly promoting better security practices, and developers have gained experience in using GitHub Actions. Investigating how developers' practices for handling GitHub Actions security have changed over time could offer valuable insights for further strengthening the security of these workflows. In this study, we analyzed non-optimal security practices in 18,938 workflows from 5,246 active GitHub repositories. By comparing the prevalence of issues spotted in two different years (2022 and 2024), we find that the instances of No Permissions Specified have significantly reduced as more developers now explicitly define permissions in their workflows. However, other issues, such as Confidential Data Disclosure, remain prevalent, underscoring the need for continued vigilance and further research in this domain.

Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting Security Practices for Github Actions Workflows — Bin Lin, Jiangnan Huang · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS