Hybrid Linguistic Models: Combining Traditional Philology and Deep Learning for Historical Analysis

Traditional philology, with its rigorous linguistic analysis of historical texts, and deep learning, with its advanced computational capabilities, offer complementary strengths for historical language analysis. However, existing methods often struggle with inaccuracies in text reconstruction, semantic ambiguity, and limited adaptability to diverse linguistic structures. To address these challenges, we propose the Hybrid Linguistic Model for Historical Analysis (HLM-HA), which integrates rule-based philological approaches with deep neural networks. HLM-HA leverages linguistic rules to enhance model training, ensuring contextual accuracy while utilizing deep learning’s capacity to analyze vast textual datasets. Using HLM-HA, historical texts are processed through a dual-layered framework: first, traditional philological techniques refine linguistic input, and second, deep learning models (DLM) optimize pattern recognition and semantic interpretation. This hybrid lingusitic significantly improves text reconstruction, contextual inference, and historical language modeling. Our findings indicate that HLM-HA outperforms existing methods in historical text accuracy, semantic clarity, and adaptability to complex linguistic structures. The proposed framework enhances the precision of historical linguistic studies, paving the way for more reliable text analysis in philology and computational linguistics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccies63851.2025.11032631
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Linguistic Models: Combining Traditional Philology and Deep Learning for Historical Analysis

Rano Ibragimova, Zilola Sattorova, Ahmad Hasanov, Mubarak Ataniyazova et al.
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Hybrid Linguistic Models: Combining Traditional Philology and Deep Learning for Historical Analysis

Rano Ibragimova, Zilola Sattorova, Ahmad Hasanov, Mubarak Ataniyazova, Gulnoza Berdiyeva, Ozoda Tursunova
article en

Abstract

Traditional philology, with its rigorous linguistic analysis of historical texts, and deep learning, with its advanced computational capabilities, offer complementary strengths for historical language analysis. However, existing methods often struggle with inaccuracies in text reconstruction, semantic ambiguity, and limited adaptability to diverse linguistic structures. To address these challenges, we propose the Hybrid Linguistic Model for Historical Analysis (HLM-HA), which integrates rule-based philological approaches with deep neural networks. HLM-HA leverages linguistic rules to enhance model training, ensuring contextual accuracy while utilizing deep learning’s capacity to analyze vast textual datasets. Using HLM-HA, historical texts are processed through a dual-layered framework: first, traditional philological techniques refine linguistic input, and second, deep learning models (DLM) optimize pattern recognition and semantic interpretation. This hybrid lingusitic significantly improves text reconstruction, contextual inference, and historical language modeling. Our findings indicate that HLM-HA outperforms existing methods in historical text accuracy, semantic clarity, and adaptability to complex linguistic structures. The proposed framework enhances the precision of historical linguistic studies, paving the way for more reliable text analysis in philology and computational linguistics.

Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov (UZ), Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies (UZ), Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali ibn Sino (UZ), Jizzakh State Pedagogical University (UZ), Karakalpak State University (UZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.