The Discriminatory Nature of AI: A Comprehensive Analysis through 5Ws and PESTEL Frameworks

This study investigates the discriminatory nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) through a dual analytical approach: the 5Ws framework (What, When, Where, Why, Who) and PESTEL analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal). Findings reveal systemic biases in AI algorithms, with 78% of cases linked to non-representative training data (Mehrabi et al., 2021). The research highlights AI’s violation of UNSDG 5 (Gender Equality) and UNSDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), demonstrating how algorithmic discrimination exacerbates social inequities. Through a Utilitarian ethical lens, AI’s current implementation is deemed unethical due to its net negative societal impact. The paper proposes two actionable solutions: (1) multi-stakeholder awareness campaigns and (2) incentive-based regulatory frameworks. This work contributes to the ongoing discourse on ethical AI by quantifying discrimination patterns and offering policy-ready recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icaid65275.2025.11034502
Primary Topic
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Discriminatory Nature of AI: A Comprehensive Analysis through 5Ws and PESTEL Frameworks

Zong Zhuang
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
article

The Discriminatory Nature of AI: A Comprehensive Analysis through 5Ws and PESTEL Frameworks

Zong Zhuang
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the discriminatory nature of Artificial Intelligence (AI) through a dual analytical approach: the 5Ws framework (What, When, Where, Why, Who) and PESTEL analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Legal). Findings reveal systemic biases in AI algorithms, with 78% of cases linked to non-representative training data (Mehrabi et al., 2021). The research highlights AI’s violation of UNSDG 5 (Gender Equality) and UNSDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), demonstrating how algorithmic discrimination exacerbates social inequities. Through a Utilitarian ethical lens, AI’s current implementation is deemed unethical due to its net negative societal impact. The paper proposes two actionable solutions: (1) multi-stakeholder awareness campaigns and (2) incentive-based regulatory frameworks. This work contributes to the ongoing discourse on ethical AI by quantifying discrimination patterns and offering policy-ready recommendations.

UNSW Sydney (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Discriminatory Nature of AI: A Comprehensive Analysis through 5Ws and PESTEL Frameworks — Zong Zhuang · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS