BROAD DATA: Ethnographic methods in the age of interdisciplinary collaboration

Under the aegis of what we term “broad data ethnography”, we outline four principles for the standardized collection, processing, and analysis of ethnographic data, particularly fieldnotes: compilability, compatibility , counting , and computability . As we demonstrate via examples from an interdisciplinary study at a Danish politics festival: compilability denotes the need for a shared data structure; compatibility refers to the demand for high similarity in data content; counting captures how standardizing both form and content emables systematic use of quantitative measures in the field, which in turn, and finally, allows for subsequent computational analysis. Finally, we address the potentials and pitfalls of adhering to these four principles, suggesting that in an age of increasing interdisciplinary collaboration and ubiquitous digital platforms and AI tools, “broad data ethnography” offers an attractive alternative to conventional “thick data” by allowing for short-term, computationally-augmented, team-based ethnography in situations where more individual and idiosyncratic approaches are not feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnography
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381251349061
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BROAD DATA: Ethnographic methods in the age of interdisciplinary collaboration

Morten Axel Pedersen, Clara Rosa Sandbye, Sofie Læbo Astrupgaard, Emile Munch Gregersen
Ethnography
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

BROAD DATA: Ethnographic methods in the age of interdisciplinary collaboration

Morten Axel Pedersen, Clara Rosa Sandbye, Sofie Læbo Astrupgaard, Emile Munch Gregersen
article en

Abstract

Under the aegis of what we term “broad data ethnography”, we outline four principles for the standardized collection, processing, and analysis of ethnographic data, particularly fieldnotes: compilability, compatibility , counting , and computability . As we demonstrate via examples from an interdisciplinary study at a Danish politics festival: compilability denotes the need for a shared data structure; compatibility refers to the demand for high similarity in data content; counting captures how standardizing both form and content emables systematic use of quantitative measures in the field, which in turn, and finally, allows for subsequent computational analysis. Finally, we address the potentials and pitfalls of adhering to these four principles, suggesting that in an age of increasing interdisciplinary collaboration and ubiquitous digital platforms and AI tools, “broad data ethnography” offers an attractive alternative to conventional “thick data” by allowing for short-term, computationally-augmented, team-based ethnography in situations where more individual and idiosyncratic approaches are not feasible.

Ethnography
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK)
Innovationsfonden, Carlsbergfondet, H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.