The difference between Guidance and Learning – a Case Study of Augmented Assembly Assistance Systems

Augmented Assistance Systems (AAS) are a major topic in factory digitalization. From maintenance and repair to logistics, they enhance worker abilities and provide support in uncertain or unfamiliar situations. Past studies have shown a significant effect on productivity, flexibility, process speed, and efficiency. On the other hand, technical solutions can quickly become quite complex, resulting in high costs for implementation and adaptation. At the same time, workers may feel overwhelmed by such systems, which increases their cognitive stress and even generates rejection of their use. This contribution thus presents two studies. The first one was carried out to measure speed change and failure rate and obtain information on cognitive stress and user acceptance. The second one indicates the difference between guidance and learning: While volunteers were significantly faster with the use of an AAS, they learned less from the experience than peers using paper descriptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia CIRP
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.03.013
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The difference between Guidance and Learning – a Case Study of Augmented Assembly Assistance Systems

Eike Permin, Carlos Jahn, Lina Castillo, Matthias Drossel et al.
Procedia CIRP
Augmented Reality Applications
article

The difference between Guidance and Learning – a Case Study of Augmented Assembly Assistance Systems

Eike Permin, Carlos Jahn, Lina Castillo, Matthias Drossel, Carsten Wohlgemuth
article en

Abstract

Augmented Assistance Systems (AAS) are a major topic in factory digitalization. From maintenance and repair to logistics, they enhance worker abilities and provide support in uncertain or unfamiliar situations. Past studies have shown a significant effect on productivity, flexibility, process speed, and efficiency. On the other hand, technical solutions can quickly become quite complex, resulting in high costs for implementation and adaptation. At the same time, workers may feel overwhelmed by such systems, which increases their cognitive stress and even generates rejection of their use. This contribution thus presents two studies. The first one was carried out to measure speed change and failure rate and obtain information on cognitive stress and user acceptance. The second one indicates the difference between guidance and learning: While volunteers were significantly faster with the use of an AAS, they learned less from the experience than peers using paper descriptions.

Procedia CIRPVol. 134
Kreiskrankenhaus Gummersbach (DE), Rheinmetall (Switzerland) (CH), FH Aachen (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The difference between Guidance and Learning – a Case Study of Augmented Assembly Assistance Systems — Eike Permin, Carlos Jahn, et al. · Procedia CIRP (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS