Evaluating the impact of regulatory and policy frameworks on sustainable supply chain management in the national capital region (NCR) of India

This study investigates the impact of regulatory and policy frameworks on the adoption and effectiveness of Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) practices in the National Capital Region (NCR) of India-one of the country's most industrially diverse and environmentally sensitive economic zones. The primary objectives are to (i) assess organizational awareness and compliance with key environmental regulations, (ii) evaluate how these regulations influence environmental performance and supply chain sustainability, and (iii) identify implementation challenges across various organizational sizes and sectors. The research employs a mixed-methods approach using a stratified random sampling strategy to gather quantitative and qualitative data through structured questionnaires. The sample includes micro, small, medium, and large enterprises operating across key sectors such as manufacturing, services, retail, and logistics. Data analysis combines descriptive statistics, correlation and regression analyses, as well as thematic and content analyses, to offer a multi-dimensional understanding of SSCM implementation dynamics. Key findings reveal that regulatory awareness and implementation effectiveness are significantly higher among large enterprises compared to micro and small enterprises, primarily due to disparities in financial resources, technical expertise, and infrastructure. Among the four regulatory frameworks studied-Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), Solid Waste Management Rules (2016), Bharat Stage VI Standards, and E-Waste Management Rules (2016)-GRAP shows the highest awareness and perceived effectiveness. Organizations implementing SSCM practices report measurable improvements in environmental performance, particularly in emissions reduction, waste management efficiency, and resource utilization. However, financial constraints, regulatory complexity, and limited technological capabilities remain significant barriers for smaller firms. The study concludes that while regulatory frameworks are generally effective in catalyzing sustainable practices, their success is uneven across organizational sizes and sectors. It recommends more nuanced, size-specific policy interventions, greater government and institutional support for capacity building, and increased access to technological solutions to ensure broader SSCM adoption. This research contributes to the evolving discourse on sustainability in emerging economies by offering policy-relevant insights into regulatory impact, organizational behavior, and regional development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26648792.2025.v7.i1m.397
Primary Topic
Indian Economic and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the impact of regulatory and policy frameworks on sustainable supply chain management in the national capital region (NCR) of India

Shweta Gupta, Peter Jacob Hinneh
International Journal of Research in Management
Indian Economic and Social Development
article

Evaluating the impact of regulatory and policy frameworks on sustainable supply chain management in the national capital region (NCR) of India

Shweta Gupta, Peter Jacob Hinneh
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of regulatory and policy frameworks on the adoption and effectiveness of Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) practices in the National Capital Region (NCR) of India-one of the country's most industrially diverse and environmentally sensitive economic zones. The primary objectives are to (i) assess organizational awareness and compliance with key environmental regulations, (ii) evaluate how these regulations influence environmental performance and supply chain sustainability, and (iii) identify implementation challenges across various organizational sizes and sectors. The research employs a mixed-methods approach using a stratified random sampling strategy to gather quantitative and qualitative data through structured questionnaires. The sample includes micro, small, medium, and large enterprises operating across key sectors such as manufacturing, services, retail, and logistics. Data analysis combines descriptive statistics, correlation and regression analyses, as well as thematic and content analyses, to offer a multi-dimensional understanding of SSCM implementation dynamics. Key findings reveal that regulatory awareness and implementation effectiveness are significantly higher among large enterprises compared to micro and small enterprises, primarily due to disparities in financial resources, technical expertise, and infrastructure. Among the four regulatory frameworks studied-Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP), Solid Waste Management Rules (2016), Bharat Stage VI Standards, and E-Waste Management Rules (2016)-GRAP shows the highest awareness and perceived effectiveness. Organizations implementing SSCM practices report measurable improvements in environmental performance, particularly in emissions reduction, waste management efficiency, and resource utilization. However, financial constraints, regulatory complexity, and limited technological capabilities remain significant barriers for smaller firms. The study concludes that while regulatory frameworks are generally effective in catalyzing sustainable practices, their success is uneven across organizational sizes and sectors. It recommends more nuanced, size-specific policy interventions, greater government and institutional support for capacity building, and increased access to technological solutions to ensure broader SSCM adoption. This research contributes to the evolving discourse on sustainability in emerging economies by offering policy-relevant insights into regulatory impact, organizational behavior, and regional development.

International Journal of Research in ManagementVol. 7(1)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Indian Economic and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.