Cultural Reconfiguration in Croatia: Interactions between Tradition and Modernity after Independence

This study offers an in-depth analysis of Croatia’s political transition following its 1991 independence from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, focusing on the reconstruction of cultural identity and the structural transformation of cultural politics that accompanied the democratization process and the introduction of a market economy. In particular, the research examines how the cultural policies and integrated identity strategies of the Yugoslav era, along with socialist-era mechanisms of expression control, shaped cultural legacies and structures of repression. Building on this historical context, the study explores how post-independence Croatia pursued nationalism-centered cultural policies, redefined traditional symbols, and politicized memory to construct a new national identity. In the main body, the research identifies key features of Croatia’s cultural transformation during its transition: the shift toward a post-socialist cultural order, the political symbolization of tradition and religion, the intensification of nationalist discourse in the cultural sphere, the restructuring of censorship and freedom of expression, and the emergence of independent cultural spaces and civil society initiatives. The theoretical framework draws on Aleida Assmann’s concept of “frames of memory” to analyze the interrelation between collective memory reconstruction and cultural identity formation. Within this framework, culture is shown to function not merely as a domain of artistic expression but as a central mechanism in the construction of political legitimacy and national origin narratives. Furthermore, the study examines the rise of various independent cultural organizations (such as MaMa, Attack, and Domino) since the 2000s, investigating how civil society initiatives offered alternative narratives to the dominant nationalism-oriented cultural politics. Literary works, films, and visual arts increasingly addressed themes of post-Yugoslav identity, gender, trauma, and displacement—thereby contributing to the development of cultural democracy and the recovery of public discourse. In conclusion, this paper argues that the Croatian case reveals the transitional process not as a mere institutional shift, but as a profound cultural and political reconfiguration of memory and identity structures. This insight provides a broadly applicable analytical framework for understanding the post-socialist transitions of Eastern European countries. Croatia’s experience is interpreted as a dynamic case of cultural politics unfolding within the dialectical tension between cultural democratization and political symbolization—offering valuable academic perspectives on memory politics and intergenerational identity conflicts in the digital age.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
East European and Balkan Institute
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19170/eebs.2025.49.2.3
Primary Topic
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Reconfiguration in Croatia: Interactions between Tradition and Modernity after Independence

Sang Hun Kim
East European and Balkan Institute
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
article

Cultural Reconfiguration in Croatia: Interactions between Tradition and Modernity after Independence

Sang Hun Kim
article en

Abstract

This study offers an in-depth analysis of Croatia’s political transition following its 1991 independence from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, focusing on the reconstruction of cultural identity and the structural transformation of cultural politics that accompanied the democratization process and the introduction of a market economy. In particular, the research examines how the cultural policies and integrated identity strategies of the Yugoslav era, along with socialist-era mechanisms of expression control, shaped cultural legacies and structures of repression. Building on this historical context, the study explores how post-independence Croatia pursued nationalism-centered cultural policies, redefined traditional symbols, and politicized memory to construct a new national identity. In the main body, the research identifies key features of Croatia’s cultural transformation during its transition: the shift toward a post-socialist cultural order, the political symbolization of tradition and religion, the intensification of nationalist discourse in the cultural sphere, the restructuring of censorship and freedom of expression, and the emergence of independent cultural spaces and civil society initiatives. The theoretical framework draws on Aleida Assmann’s concept of “frames of memory” to analyze the interrelation between collective memory reconstruction and cultural identity formation. Within this framework, culture is shown to function not merely as a domain of artistic expression but as a central mechanism in the construction of political legitimacy and national origin narratives. Furthermore, the study examines the rise of various independent cultural organizations (such as MaMa, Attack, and Domino) since the 2000s, investigating how civil society initiatives offered alternative narratives to the dominant nationalism-oriented cultural politics. Literary works, films, and visual arts increasingly addressed themes of post-Yugoslav identity, gender, trauma, and displacement—thereby contributing to the development of cultural democracy and the recovery of public discourse. In conclusion, this paper argues that the Croatian case reveals the transitional process not as a mere institutional shift, but as a profound cultural and political reconfiguration of memory and identity structures. This insight provides a broadly applicable analytical framework for understanding the post-socialist transitions of Eastern European countries. Croatia’s experience is interpreted as a dynamic case of cultural politics unfolding within the dialectical tension between cultural democratization and political symbolization—offering valuable academic perspectives on memory politics and intergenerational identity conflicts in the digital age.

East European and Balkan InstituteVol. 49(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.