Ethical AI in Banking: A Sectoral Literature Review with Case-Based Interventions

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into banking, concerns around bias, privacy, and governance are becoming increasingly urgent. This article explores the ethical risks of AI in financial services and reviews practical interventions that can help banks use AI responsibly. Drawing from literature and real-world examples from institutions like JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, HSBC, Bank of America, Triodos Bank and Credit Union Australia, the study highlights five key strategies: implementing Explainable AI (XAI), using bias detection tools, forming ethics committees, educating customers, and aligning with global standards such as the EU AI Act, OECD AI Principles, and NIST AI RMF. The article evaluates tools like IBM’s AI Fairness 360, Google’s What-If Tool, and Fairkit-learn for detecting and mitigating bias in automated decisions. While challenges such as cost, technical complexity, and organizational resistance exist, especially for smaller banks, the findings show that ethical, transparent AI is achievable and scalable. The paper concludes that strong leadership, stakeholder engagement, and policy alignment are critical for building AI systems that are fair, trustworthy, and fit for the future of banking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Business and Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2025.134125
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical AI in Banking: A Sectoral Literature Review with Case-Based Interventions

John Smit
1 links
Open Journal of Business and Management
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Ethical AI in Banking: A Sectoral Literature Review with Case-Based Interventions

John Smit
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into banking, concerns around bias, privacy, and governance are becoming increasingly urgent. This article explores the ethical risks of AI in financial services and reviews practical interventions that can help banks use AI responsibly. Drawing from literature and real-world examples from institutions like JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, HSBC, Bank of America, Triodos Bank and Credit Union Australia, the study highlights five key strategies: implementing Explainable AI (XAI), using bias detection tools, forming ethics committees, educating customers, and aligning with global standards such as the EU AI Act, OECD AI Principles, and NIST AI RMF. The article evaluates tools like IBM’s AI Fairness 360, Google’s What-If Tool, and Fairkit-learn for detecting and mitigating bias in automated decisions. While challenges such as cost, technical complexity, and organizational resistance exist, especially for smaller banks, the findings show that ethical, transparent AI is achievable and scalable. The paper concludes that strong leadership, stakeholder engagement, and policy alignment are critical for building AI systems that are fair, trustworthy, and fit for the future of banking.

Open Journal of Business and ManagementVol. 13(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical AI in Banking: A Sectoral Literature Review with Case-Based Interventions — John Smit · Open Journal of Business and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS