A ‘major breakthrough’, yet potentially ‘entirely ineffective’? Experts’ opinions about the ‘total ban’ on unhealthy food marketing online in the UK’s Health and Care Act (2022)

The UK's Health and Care Act (2022; paused until 2025) includes a globally novel ban on paid-for online advertising of food and beverage products high in saturated fat, salt and sugar (HFSS), to address growing concerns about the scale of digital marketing and its impact in particular on children's food and beverage preferences, purchases and consumption. This study aimed to understand the potential impact of the novel ban (as proposed in 2020) on specified forms of online HFSS advertising, through the lens of interdisciplinary expertise. We conducted semi-structured interviews via videoconference with eight purposively selected UK and global digital marketing, food and privacy experts. We identified deductive and inductive themes addressing the policy's scope, design, implementation, monitoring and enforcement through iterative, consensual thematic analyses. Experts felt this novel 'breakthrough' policy has potential to substantially impact global marketing by establishing the principle of no HFSS advertising online to consumers of all ages, but they also identified substantive limitations that could potentially render it 'entirely ineffective', for example, the exclusion of common forms of digital marketing, especially brand marketing and marketing integrated within entertainment content; virtual/augmented reality, and 'advertainment' as particularly likely spaces for rapid growth of digital food marketing; and technical digital media issues that raise significant barriers to effective monitoring and compliance. Experts recommended well-defined regulations with strong enforcement mechanisms. These findings contribute insights for effective design and implementation of global initiatives to limit online HFSS food marketing, including the need for government regulations in place of voluntary industry restrictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114523002829
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A ‘major breakthrough’, yet potentially ‘entirely ineffective’? Experts’ opinions about the ‘total ban’ on unhealthy food marketing online in the UK’s Health and Care Act (2022)

Michelle Young, Mimi Tatlow‐Golden, Emma Jane Boyland, Victoria Targett et al.
2 citations
British Journal Of Nutrition
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
3.76
article

A ‘major breakthrough’, yet potentially ‘entirely ineffective’? Experts’ opinions about the ‘total ban’ on unhealthy food marketing online in the UK’s Health and Care Act (2022)

Michelle Young, Mimi Tatlow‐Golden, Emma Jane Boyland, Victoria Targett, Jennifer L. Harris, Magdalena Muc, Jayne Rodgers, Louisa Ells, Zoe Hill
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The UK's Health and Care Act (2022; paused until 2025) includes a globally novel ban on paid-for online advertising of food and beverage products high in saturated fat, salt and sugar (HFSS), to address growing concerns about the scale of digital marketing and its impact in particular on children's food and beverage preferences, purchases and consumption. This study aimed to understand the potential impact of the novel ban (as proposed in 2020) on specified forms of online HFSS advertising, through the lens of interdisciplinary expertise. We conducted semi-structured interviews via videoconference with eight purposively selected UK and global digital marketing, food and privacy experts. We identified deductive and inductive themes addressing the policy's scope, design, implementation, monitoring and enforcement through iterative, consensual thematic analyses. Experts felt this novel 'breakthrough' policy has potential to substantially impact global marketing by establishing the principle of no HFSS advertising online to consumers of all ages, but they also identified substantive limitations that could potentially render it 'entirely ineffective', for example, the exclusion of common forms of digital marketing, especially brand marketing and marketing integrated within entertainment content; virtual/augmented reality, and 'advertainment' as particularly likely spaces for rapid growth of digital food marketing; and technical digital media issues that raise significant barriers to effective monitoring and compliance. Experts recommended well-defined regulations with strong enforcement mechanisms. These findings contribute insights for effective design and implementation of global initiatives to limit online HFSS food marketing, including the need for government regulations in place of voluntary industry restrictions.

British Journal Of NutritionVol. 133(6)
Department of Health and Social Care (GB), University of Connecticut (US), University of Liverpool (GB), The Open University (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB), Teesside University (GB)
Leeds Beckett University, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Public Health England
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.