Mental health problems in an academic setting among undergraduates

Purpose The purpose of this study is to illustrate that post-pandemic mental health is of growing concern in academic settings, especially among STEM undergraduate majors and women. Design/methodology/approach During 2023, online and paper-pencil surveys were distributed at a southeastern university after Institutional Review Board approval. Measures were Patient Depression Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Test and Sleep Disorder Symptom Checklist. Findings Participants (n = 929) were mostly female (68%), STEM undergraduate majors (58%), between 19 and 29 years (98.2%) and white (84.1%). A Fisher’s exact test revealed significant differences when examining gender by STEM (STEM and Non-STEM) (Females: 60.4%; Males 52.0%, p < 0.05). Based on the measures outlined previously, 19.98% had moderately severe to severe depression, 26.50% scored in the moderate to severe anxiety categories, 3.50% scored has having severe or extremely severe OCD, and 51.38% of participants scored has having sleep problems. Research limitations/implications Odds ratios revealed STEM majors had a 1.5 greater risk of moderate to severe ANX (95%CI[1.12, 2.08], p < 0.01) compared to non-STEM. Females had a 3.81× greater risk of moderate to severe ANX (95% CI[2.57,5.66], p < 0.0001) and a 1.93× greater risk of moderately severe to severe DEP (95%CI[1.31, 2.83], p < 0.001) than males. Originality/value Mental health professionals who work with undergraduate students, particularly STEM majors and females, should be aware that this population may experience greater risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Mental Health
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-01-2025-0013
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental health problems in an academic setting among undergraduates

Sharon Thompson, Abigail M. Hatcher, Caitlyn R. Flemmer, Alyssa Avallone et al.
Journal of Public Mental Health
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Mental health problems in an academic setting among undergraduates

Sharon Thompson, Abigail M. Hatcher, Caitlyn R. Flemmer, Alyssa Avallone, Clare Cuenya
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to illustrate that post-pandemic mental health is of growing concern in academic settings, especially among STEM undergraduate majors and women. Design/methodology/approach During 2023, online and paper-pencil surveys were distributed at a southeastern university after Institutional Review Board approval. Measures were Patient Depression Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Test and Sleep Disorder Symptom Checklist. Findings Participants (n = 929) were mostly female (68%), STEM undergraduate majors (58%), between 19 and 29 years (98.2%) and white (84.1%). A Fisher’s exact test revealed significant differences when examining gender by STEM (STEM and Non-STEM) (Females: 60.4%; Males 52.0%, p < 0.05). Based on the measures outlined previously, 19.98% had moderately severe to severe depression, 26.50% scored in the moderate to severe anxiety categories, 3.50% scored has having severe or extremely severe OCD, and 51.38% of participants scored has having sleep problems. Research limitations/implications Odds ratios revealed STEM majors had a 1.5 greater risk of moderate to severe ANX (95%CI[1.12, 2.08], p < 0.01) compared to non-STEM. Females had a 3.81× greater risk of moderate to severe ANX (95% CI[2.57,5.66], p < 0.0001) and a 1.93× greater risk of moderately severe to severe DEP (95%CI[1.31, 2.83], p < 0.001) than males. Originality/value Mental health professionals who work with undergraduate students, particularly STEM majors and females, should be aware that this population may experience greater risks.

Journal of Public Mental HealthVol. 24(3)
Coastal Carolina University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.