Why your World Cup experience doesn’t help you much: Understanding the roots of inequalities in women's elite football through Bourdieu's theory on field

This study analyzes gender inequality in Korea's women's elite football through Bourdieu's concept of field, examining how overt and covert structural forces shape players’ experiences and limit their achievements. Engaging with Bourdieu's notions of field and its constitutive elements, we investigate the sociocultural dynamics and power relations that define women's positions within the elite sport system. Using longitudinal, qualitative interviews with current and former women's national team players ( n = 8), we explore how increased heteronomy, discrepancies between symbolic and social structures, and limited mobility impact players’ career choices and access to opportunities. Findings reveal that women's football is increasingly shaped by norms rooted in men's football, which overshadow women's accomplishments and limit both the tangible and intangible rewards of their achievements in elite football (e.g. World Cup experience). Furthermore, the study identifies significant barriers to transitioning into related fields, such as coaching and media, which perpetuate gender-based inequalities. This research highlights the need for a critical reassessment of structural factors within women's football and advocates for targeted policy changes to foster a more equitable environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review for the Sociology of Sport
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902251348097
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why your World Cup experience doesn’t help you much: Understanding the roots of inequalities in women's elite football through Bourdieu's theory on field

Jin Myung Park, Juho Park, Yong Chae Rhee, Alex C. Gang et al.
International Review for the Sociology of Sport
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

Why your World Cup experience doesn’t help you much: Understanding the roots of inequalities in women's elite football through Bourdieu's theory on field

Jin Myung Park, Juho Park, Yong Chae Rhee, Alex C. Gang, Ju Young Lee, K.H. Choi
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes gender inequality in Korea's women's elite football through Bourdieu's concept of field, examining how overt and covert structural forces shape players’ experiences and limit their achievements. Engaging with Bourdieu's notions of field and its constitutive elements, we investigate the sociocultural dynamics and power relations that define women's positions within the elite sport system. Using longitudinal, qualitative interviews with current and former women's national team players ( n = 8), we explore how increased heteronomy, discrepancies between symbolic and social structures, and limited mobility impact players’ career choices and access to opportunities. Findings reveal that women's football is increasingly shaped by norms rooted in men's football, which overshadow women's accomplishments and limit both the tangible and intangible rewards of their achievements in elite football (e.g. World Cup experience). Furthermore, the study identifies significant barriers to transitioning into related fields, such as coaching and media, which perpetuate gender-based inequalities. This research highlights the need for a critical reassessment of structural factors within women's football and advocates for targeted policy changes to foster a more equitable environment.

International Review for the Sociology of Sport
Western Illinois University (US), Seoul National University (KR), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Korea Institute of Sport Science (KR), Illinois State University (US), Washington State University (US), Citadel (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.