The Response of Global Oil Inventories to Supply Shocks

Oil inventories are essential in alleviating realized and anticipated supply shocks and represent a key market indicator. This study examines the responses of global and country oil inventories to supply shocks under tight and loose market conditions. We utilize an expanded version of the GVAR model, adding the OECD oil inventories variable, incorporating major oil-producing countries: Iran, Russia, and Venezuela, and extending the coverage period. Our simulations indicate that a negative global supply shock significantly affects oil inventories under “tight” market conditions. The model correctly predicts the trajectory of changes to oil inventories in South Korea following a supply shock to Russian production in tight markets and Iranian output in loose markets. This case also shows that commercial players, using their inventories as a buffer, can negate government attempts to maintain constant levels of reserves. Overall, the response to the oil inventory tends to vary across producing and importing countries and market conditions. Such dynamics highlight potential problems with specific policies, such as using inventories as a buffer to alleviate price fluctuations or disrupting the oil production of individual countries through sanctions, as these measures oftentimes result in unintended consequences due to complex interconnections of the global oil market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Commodities
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities4020010
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Response of Global Oil Inventories to Supply Shocks

Philipp Galkin, Jennifer I. Considine, Abdullah Aldayel, Emre Hatipoğlu
Commodities
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

The Response of Global Oil Inventories to Supply Shocks

Philipp Galkin, Jennifer I. Considine, Abdullah Aldayel, Emre Hatipoğlu
article en

Abstract

Oil inventories are essential in alleviating realized and anticipated supply shocks and represent a key market indicator. This study examines the responses of global and country oil inventories to supply shocks under tight and loose market conditions. We utilize an expanded version of the GVAR model, adding the OECD oil inventories variable, incorporating major oil-producing countries: Iran, Russia, and Venezuela, and extending the coverage period. Our simulations indicate that a negative global supply shock significantly affects oil inventories under “tight” market conditions. The model correctly predicts the trajectory of changes to oil inventories in South Korea following a supply shock to Russian production in tight markets and Iranian output in loose markets. This case also shows that commercial players, using their inventories as a buffer, can negate government attempts to maintain constant levels of reserves. Overall, the response to the oil inventory tends to vary across producing and importing countries and market conditions. Such dynamics highlight potential problems with specific policies, such as using inventories as a buffer to alleviate price fluctuations or disrupting the oil production of individual countries through sanctions, as these measures oftentimes result in unintended consequences due to complex interconnections of the global oil market.

CommoditiesVol. 4(2)
University of Dundee (GB), King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.