Empirical Budgeting Research in Accounting Journals: Review, Critique, and Research Agenda

This systematic literature review examines 59 empirical studies on budgeting published between 2003 and 2023 in high-calibre accounting journals. It identifies three dominant themes: participative budgeting, budgetary slack, and Beyond Budgeting. While participative budgeting and slack studies focus on traditional issues, Beyond Budgeting research addresses practitioners’ concerns more directly. The review highlights significant gaps in linking academic research to real-world challenges, particularly regarding strategic relevance and flexibility. A research agenda is proposed to align future studies with practitioners’ concerns. This review contributes by mapping budgeting research development and critically assessing its practical impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Finance & Governance Review/Accounting finance & governance review
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52399/001c.140425
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Budgeting Research in Accounting Journals: Review, Critique, and Research Agenda

Catherine Batt
3 citations
Accounting Finance & Governance Review/Accounting finance & governance review
Accounting and Organizational Management
6.85
article

Empirical Budgeting Research in Accounting Journals: Review, Critique, and Research Agenda

Catherine Batt
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines 59 empirical studies on budgeting published between 2003 and 2023 in high-calibre accounting journals. It identifies three dominant themes: participative budgeting, budgetary slack, and Beyond Budgeting. While participative budgeting and slack studies focus on traditional issues, Beyond Budgeting research addresses practitioners’ concerns more directly. The review highlights significant gaps in linking academic research to real-world challenges, particularly regarding strategic relevance and flexibility. A research agenda is proposed to align future studies with practitioners’ concerns. This review contributes by mapping budgeting research development and critically assessing its practical impact.

Accounting Finance & Governance Review/Accounting finance & governance reviewVol. 34
Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Accounting and Organizational Management
6.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.