Potential Impact of Screening Examinations on Prognosis of De Novo Malignancies in Adult Patients After Liver Transplantation

Background: De novo malignancies (DNMs) after liver transplantation (LT) are a major cause of long-term mortality. However, no definitive screening protocol has been established due to their diversity. This study aimed to evaluate DNM diagnosis methods, screening protocols, and prognoses. Methods: This retrospective study included 231 adult LT recipients from April 1997 to March 2021. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed to assess the impact of screening on prognosis. Most recipients underwent serum tests every three months, annual gastrointestinal endoscopy, and chest-abdominal CT as part of routine surveillance. Results: Twenty-five DNMs were diagnosed in 22 patients, with median age of 61 years (range, 23–72), of whom 13 (59.1%) were female. The duration from transplantation to DNM diagnosis of DNM was 88 months (range, 4–195). DNM was diagnosed as follows: seven patients (31.8%) through screening (screening group) and 15 patients (68.2%) by other means (non-screening group). Curative treatment was achieved in all of the patients diagnosed by screening, whereas it was possible in only 60.0% of patients diagnosed by other means (p = 0.026). DSS in the screening group was significantly longer than that in the non-screening group (p = 0.024). Conclusions: While screening was associated with earlier-stage diagnosis and improved outcomes in some patients, the overall efficacy of the protocol requires further validation in larger studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Livers
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/livers5020026
Primary Topic
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential Impact of Screening Examinations on Prognosis of De Novo Malignancies in Adult Patients After Liver Transplantation

Shutaro Hori, Sho Uemura, Minoru Kitago, Hideaki Obara et al.
Livers
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
article

Potential Impact of Screening Examinations on Prognosis of De Novo Malignancies in Adult Patients After Liver Transplantation

Shutaro Hori, Sho Uemura, Minoru Kitago, Hideaki Obara, Yutaka Nakano, Masayuki Tanaka, Yasushi Hasegawa, Yuta Abe, Hiroshi Yagi, Yuko Kitagawa
article en

Abstract

Background: De novo malignancies (DNMs) after liver transplantation (LT) are a major cause of long-term mortality. However, no definitive screening protocol has been established due to their diversity. This study aimed to evaluate DNM diagnosis methods, screening protocols, and prognoses. Methods: This retrospective study included 231 adult LT recipients from April 1997 to March 2021. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was analyzed to assess the impact of screening on prognosis. Most recipients underwent serum tests every three months, annual gastrointestinal endoscopy, and chest-abdominal CT as part of routine surveillance. Results: Twenty-five DNMs were diagnosed in 22 patients, with median age of 61 years (range, 23–72), of whom 13 (59.1%) were female. The duration from transplantation to DNM diagnosis of DNM was 88 months (range, 4–195). DNM was diagnosed as follows: seven patients (31.8%) through screening (screening group) and 15 patients (68.2%) by other means (non-screening group). Curative treatment was achieved in all of the patients diagnosed by screening, whereas it was possible in only 60.0% of patients diagnosed by other means (p = 0.026). DSS in the screening group was significantly longer than that in the non-screening group (p = 0.024). Conclusions: While screening was associated with earlier-stage diagnosis and improved outcomes in some patients, the overall efficacy of the protocol requires further validation in larger studies.

LiversVol. 5(2)
Keio University (JP)
Keio University
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.