Recommendations for Accurate Target Expression Evaluation by Quantitative Flow Cytometry

Among various cellular characteristics, flow cytometry can evaluate antigen expression through qualitative or quantitative approaches. For relative quantification, fluorescence intensity (FI) values are converted into quantitative measurements using appropriate reference materials. To quantitatively estimate antigen density or define ligand-binding sites per cell, antibody binding capacity (ABC) values serve as the preferred metric. Standardizing assays through the conversion of arbitrary FI units into quantitative data is essential for consistency. However, reported ABC values for well-characterized antigens vary across the literature. This study addresses the challenges in achieving robust and reproducible quantitative flow cytometry data, offering methodological recommendations for accurately assessing target expression. Our research includes a comprehensive investigation of multiple factors, such as conventional and full-spectrum instruments, antibodies, reagents, matrices, cell density/confluency, cellular autofluorescence, and quantitative kits, to identify the primary sources of variation in ABC calculations. By implementing a systematic and integrated approach, we aim to ensure the generation of reliable and reproducible ABC values. Longitudinal studies provide strong evidence of assay robustness, while the established protocol further supports biomarker evaluation across different matrices and various stages of drug development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cytometry Part A
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24943
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommendations for Accurate Target Expression Evaluation by Quantitative Flow Cytometry

Anne Goubier, Alisa Kirkin, Tamara Lekishvili, Maxime Moulard et al.
2 citations
Cytometry Part A
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
1.61
article

Recommendations for Accurate Target Expression Evaluation by Quantitative Flow Cytometry

Anne Goubier, Alisa Kirkin, Tamara Lekishvili, Maxime Moulard, Gurbet Çelik, Sarah Jetzer, Teresa M. Frasconi, Amelie Croset
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Among various cellular characteristics, flow cytometry can evaluate antigen expression through qualitative or quantitative approaches. For relative quantification, fluorescence intensity (FI) values are converted into quantitative measurements using appropriate reference materials. To quantitatively estimate antigen density or define ligand-binding sites per cell, antibody binding capacity (ABC) values serve as the preferred metric. Standardizing assays through the conversion of arbitrary FI units into quantitative data is essential for consistency. However, reported ABC values for well-characterized antigens vary across the literature. This study addresses the challenges in achieving robust and reproducible quantitative flow cytometry data, offering methodological recommendations for accurately assessing target expression. Our research includes a comprehensive investigation of multiple factors, such as conventional and full-spectrum instruments, antibodies, reagents, matrices, cell density/confluency, cellular autofluorescence, and quantitative kits, to identify the primary sources of variation in ABC calculations. By implementing a systematic and integrated approach, we aim to ensure the generation of reliable and reproducible ABC values. Longitudinal studies provide strong evidence of assay robustness, while the established protocol further supports biomarker evaluation across different matrices and various stages of drug development.

Cytometry Part AVol. 107(7)
Molecular Partners (Switzerland) (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.