Contrasting responses to riverine barrier modification and fish pass provision in two anadromous non‐salmonid species during their spawning migrations

Abstract Anthropogenic in‐river structures represent barriers to migrating fishes. Fish pass designs usually focus on passing anadromous salmonids, and fish pass studies usually focus on site‐scale metrics, failing to consider the wider effects. Weir passage metrics and spawning distributions of anadromous iteroparous twaite shad Alosa fallax and semelparous sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus were assessed using acoustic telemetry between 2018 and 2023, within a catchment‐scale reconnection programme on the River Severn (‘Unlocking the Severn’ [UtS]). Reconnection was by fish pass installation (Severn mainstem; 3 deep‐vertical slot (DVS), 1 column bypass) and weir modification (Teme tributary; 1 partial removal/reduced head height, 1 reduced gradient). Time‐to‐event analysis revealed reconnection increased the probability of lamprey passing both the most downstream DVS and modified weir, and virgin shad were more likely than previous spawners to pass the DVS, but not the modified weir. Improvements in the proportion of tagged shad (to 7%) and lamprey (to 48%) passing the most downstream DVS were modest, but shad passage times were significantly reduced (by 20 days). Weir modification resulted in greater improvements in shad (to 58%) and lamprey (to 78%) passage. Reconnection also enabled passage on substantially lower flows; shad passed the most downstream Severn weir (via the DVS) at Q89 versus Q3 prior to construction, and lampreys at Q86 versus Q45. At catchment scales, reconnection significantly increased the proportion of shad passing the pre‐reconnection migration limit. However, the upstream extent of both species in the mainstem was not significantly increased. This was attributed to the limited motivations of individuals to access previously fragmented reaches; returning shad expressed fidelity to previous spawning sites and lamprey lacked pheromone cues from ammocoetes upstream. Passage motivations are predicted to increase subsequently as more individuals' spawn in these reaches. Synthesis and applications . UtS succeeded in facilitating both species to pass weirs under lower flow conditions than before. Weir modification improved passage rates more than fish pass installation, although catchment‐scale benefits currently remain limited. Project legacies include identifying long‐term monitoring needs to measure accumulating catchment‐scale benefits, and information on the suitability of reconnection methods to inform similar reconnection programmes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70093
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting responses to riverine barrier modification and fish pass provision in two anadromous non‐salmonid species during their spawning migrations

Jamie R. Dodd, J. Robert Britton, Randolph Velterop, Peter W. F. Davies et al.
1 citations
Journal of Applied Ecology
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
article

Contrasting responses to riverine barrier modification and fish pass provision in two anadromous non‐salmonid species during their spawning migrations

Jamie R. Dodd, J. Robert Britton, Randolph Velterop, Peter W. F. Davies, Andy D. Nunn, Charles Crundwell, Jonathan David Bolland, Mark I. A. Yeldham, Chris Grzesiok
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Anthropogenic in‐river structures represent barriers to migrating fishes. Fish pass designs usually focus on passing anadromous salmonids, and fish pass studies usually focus on site‐scale metrics, failing to consider the wider effects. Weir passage metrics and spawning distributions of anadromous iteroparous twaite shad Alosa fallax and semelparous sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus were assessed using acoustic telemetry between 2018 and 2023, within a catchment‐scale reconnection programme on the River Severn (‘Unlocking the Severn’ [UtS]). Reconnection was by fish pass installation (Severn mainstem; 3 deep‐vertical slot (DVS), 1 column bypass) and weir modification (Teme tributary; 1 partial removal/reduced head height, 1 reduced gradient). Time‐to‐event analysis revealed reconnection increased the probability of lamprey passing both the most downstream DVS and modified weir, and virgin shad were more likely than previous spawners to pass the DVS, but not the modified weir. Improvements in the proportion of tagged shad (to 7%) and lamprey (to 48%) passing the most downstream DVS were modest, but shad passage times were significantly reduced (by 20 days). Weir modification resulted in greater improvements in shad (to 58%) and lamprey (to 78%) passage. Reconnection also enabled passage on substantially lower flows; shad passed the most downstream Severn weir (via the DVS) at Q89 versus Q3 prior to construction, and lampreys at Q86 versus Q45. At catchment scales, reconnection significantly increased the proportion of shad passing the pre‐reconnection migration limit. However, the upstream extent of both species in the mainstem was not significantly increased. This was attributed to the limited motivations of individuals to access previously fragmented reaches; returning shad expressed fidelity to previous spawning sites and lamprey lacked pheromone cues from ammocoetes upstream. Passage motivations are predicted to increase subsequently as more individuals' spawn in these reaches. Synthesis and applications . UtS succeeded in facilitating both species to pass weirs under lower flow conditions than before. Weir modification improved passage rates more than fish pass installation, although catchment‐scale benefits currently remain limited. Project legacies include identifying long‐term monitoring needs to measure accumulating catchment‐scale benefits, and information on the suitability of reconnection methods to inform similar reconnection programmes.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 62(8)
Natural England (GB), Environment Agency (GB), University of Hull (GB), University of Plymouth (GB), Bournemouth University (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom, Natural England, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government, European Commission, National Lottery Community Fund, National Lottery Heritage Fund
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.